Instructional Framework for Integrating Cross-Cultural Content Using Culturally Responsive and Linguistically Affirming Pedagogies

Instructional Framework for Integrating Cross-Cultural Content Using Culturally Responsive and Linguistically Affirming Pedagogies

J. Joy Esquierdo, Maritza De La Trinidad
Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 23
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-5705-4.ch010
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter describes an instructional framework for culturally relevant and affirming teaching and curricula that addresses effective ways to interconnect cross-cultural content to expand cultural and content literacy in K-12. The Culturally and Linguistically Affirming Pedagogies for Local Context (CLAP-LC) Framework was developed to create culturally and linguistically affirming content, promote equitable education, and nurture student engagement. The framework centers on the intersection of cultural knowledge and lived experiences of students, families, and communities in content and curriculum to promote student achievement, especially students from minoritized and marginalized groups.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

This chapter describes an instructional framework for culturally relevant and affirming teaching and curricula that addresses effective ways to interconnect cross-cultural content to expand cultural and content literacy in P-16. This cross-cultural content is based on the historical, cultural, and geographical context of the students and communities of the lower Rio Grande Valley (RGV) in deep South Texas. The framework for teaching content using Culturally and Linguistically Affirming Pedagogies for Local Context (CLAP-LC) focuses on providing P-16 teachers and university professors with professional development opportunities to learn content that reflects the history, culture, and geography of the region to enhance the existing curriculum to develop content literacy. This Framework was developed to create culturally and linguistically affirming content, promote equitable education, and nurture student engagement. Although the framework emerged from a curriculum and pedagogical program designed for educators that teach in schools with predominate Mexican origin student population, it can be applied in diverse and distinct cultural and linguistic contexts. The Framework centers on the intersection of cultural knowledge and lived experiences of students, families and communities and curriculum to promote student achievement, especially students from minoritized and marginalized groups.

The U.S. experienced a significant demographic shift with the growth in the Hispanic/Latino population during the first decades of the twenty-first century. According to the Pew Research Center (2019), national census figures showed that the Hispanic/Latino population stood at 60.6 million, comprising 18% of the nation’s total population with 63% of the overall Hispanic/Latino population being of Mexican origin. Much of this population resides in the Southwest, Illinois, New York, and Florida. Texas alone is home to 11.5 million Hispanics/Latinos, comprising approximately 40% of the state’s total.1 The increase in this demographic also contributed to the growth of the Latina/o student population in public schools. Between 1996 to 2016, the number of Latina/o students enrolled in PreKinder-12 schools, colleges and universities in the United States doubled from 8.8 million to 17.9 million (Bauman, 2017). Thus, in 2016 Latina/o students made up an average of 22.7% of all students enrolled in P-16 schools nationwide (See Figure 1). In some areas of the country, such as the lower Rio Grande Valley (RGV) in deep South Texas, this percentage is higher and growing. With the sharp increase of Latina/o students in PK-12th grade schools, it is critical that the curriculum and teaching methods reflect the growth of this student population to meet their needs and provide an equitable education (see Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Graph on the number of Latina/o/x students enrolled in public schools

978-1-6684-5705-4.ch010.f01
Source: US Census, Current Population Survey, Student Supplement Survey Files, 1996-2016

Located along the Texas-Mexico border, the lower RGV is comprised of four counties: Cameron, Hidalgo, Starr, and Willacy Counties with Hidalgo and Cameron Counties being the largest, and has a total population of 1.36 million. The adjacent Mexican border cities of Reynosa, Matamoros, Camargo, Rio Bravo, and Valle Hermoso have a population of 1,444,091. According to census figures for 2019, the region’s demographic is predominantly Mexican origin, constituting 91.5% of the RGV’s total population.2 The two largest MSAs (Metropolitan Statistical Areas), McAllen-Edinburg- Mission and Brownsville-Harlingen, are surrounded by towns, small cities, and rural colonias. Between 2010 and 2019, the Hispanic/Latina/o population in the McAllen-Edinburg-Mission MSA grew by 13.7%, reaching 804,000.3 The RGV is also a transnational borderland (Anzaldua, 1987) that has been largely shaped by its historical, social, cultural, economic, and political development on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border. (Alonzo, 1998; Hernández, 2014; Montejano, 1987; Pagan, 2004; Valerio-Jiménez, 2013). The social cultural, linguistic and economic milieu remains heavily influenced by the steady immigration from Mexico and other Latin American countries over the last 40 years.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Place-Based Connection: Learning that links the students’ locality, environment, community, and socio-cultural context in the curriculum and encourages students to reflect on and critically examine their own community in relation to the larger community to understand their place in the world.

Linguistic Capital: An individual’s ability to leverage their language(s) pragmatics and power dynamics relevant to time, place, and manner based on the social and/or academic setting.

Content Literacy: The acquisition of school content, curriculum, and learning of culturally relevant and affirming content at a metacognitive level of processing. Students process the new content by thinking about how they can relate to the content and by reflecting on how it helps them deepen their understanding of the content.

Student-centered Environment: A learning space that focuses the lesson on the students’ contribution to the learning process and learning opportunities provided by the teacher.

Cultural Capital: The collection of knowledge, experiences, and skills that a person gains from their family, local community, and other social groups.

Culturally Affirming Pedagogy: A teaching approach that acknowledges diverse students’ cultural practices, language, and knowledge as assets and helps students appreciate their own cultural identities through positive self-reflection.

Culturally Responsive Pedagogy: A teaching method that acknowledges and supports the students and community’s culture and knowledge as assets in the classroom to make learning more meaningful. An instructional process that highlights students’ culture in the curriculum to help them develop a critical consciousness to promote academic success and educational equity.

Critical Consciousness: The development of self-awareness through a liberatory educational process that promotes the search of self-affirmation and engagement in the historical process through action.

Cultural Literacy: Being able to understand the traditions, regular activities and routines, and history of your own cultural background and that of other groups from a given culture using a critical lens.

Culturally Responsive Content: Subject matter that students can relate to because it highlights or reflects their unique lived experiences, culture, language, and identity.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset