Building an Integrative Framework for Prejudice Reduction in Schools

Building an Integrative Framework for Prejudice Reduction in Schools

Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 23
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-8837-9.ch012
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Prejudice and discrimination continue to persist within school environments, creating barriers to inclusive and equitable education. Addressing this issue requires a comprehensive and multifaceted approach that incorporates various strategies. This chapter presents an integrative framework for prejudice reduction in schools from a social-psychological perspective. Drawing upon key theories and research in social psychology, the framework proposes a holistic approach that combines individual-level interventions, intergroup contact, and institutional practices. The purpose of this study is to provide a review of the existing models on the subject and also to present a comparative analysis of the models that may contribute to ways of understanding the investigation of prejudice in schools.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Prejudice in schools has significant implications for students' well-being, academic performance, and social integration. Understanding its causes, consequences, and dynamics is crucial for creating inclusive educational environments (Kutsyuruba et al., 2015). From a social psychological perspective, prejudice in schools is influenced by socio-cognitive factors such as intergroup contact, social identity, stereotypes, and intergroup threat (Brown, 2011). The consequences of prejudice, including social exclusion and inequality, hinder students' development. By examining the social psychological aspects of prejudice in schools, effective strategies can be implemented to foster inclusivity and positive intergroup relations. While prejudice is often assumed to be learned from parents and peers, research shows a lack of correlation, emphasizing the importance of understanding this discrepancy for successful anti-bias programs (Karten, 2009). The study of prejudice has been a central theme in the social sciences, yet the application of social psychological principles in classrooms has been limited. By integrating advances in emotions and social identity theory, a new conceptual framework can enhance our understanding of stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination in schools (Nelson & Pang, 2006).

Furthermore, the consequences of prejudice in schools are far-reaching. Prejudice can lead to social exclusion, bullying, and discrimination, creating hostile environments that impede students' educational experiences and hinder their overall development (Rutland & Killen, 2015). It can also perpetuate social inequalities by reinforcing systemic biases and inhibiting equal opportunities for marginalized groups. Understanding the psychological mechanisms underlying prejudice allows educators, policymakers, and researchers to implement effective strategies to prevent and reduce prejudice in schools, fostering inclusive and supportive educational environments for all students.

This chapter aims to delve into the social psychological aspects of prejudice in schools. It will explore the theoretical frameworks that explain the origins and dynamics of prejudice, highlighting the role of intergroup processes, social identity, stereotypes, and intergroup threat. Additionally, we will examine the consequences of prejudice on students' well-being, academic outcomes, and social interactions. By understanding the social psychological factors contributing to prejudice in schools, we can identify potential interventions and strategies to promote tolerance, empathy, and positive intergroup relations among students, ultimately fostering a more inclusive and equitable educational environment.

Prejudice is said to be acquired through parental and peer influences, which is the view that is most frequently accepted. Children may be encouraged to adopt the stereotypes and attitudes of important individuals with whom they identify and from whom they want acceptance, according to Allport et al. (1979) and others subsequently (Stephan et al., 1999). Given the lack of consistency between children's racial opinions and those of their parents and peers, this premise should be questioned (Aboud & Doyle, 1996). If classroom-based antibias initiatives are to be successful in spreading attitudes of tolerance and respect, it is crucial to comprehend the reasons behind this poor connection.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset