Writing Self-Efficacy and Performance Among Students in an Online Doctoral Program

Writing Self-Efficacy and Performance Among Students in an Online Doctoral Program

Erin Breitenbach, Katherine Adler, Vanessa Pazdernik
DOI: 10.4018/IJITLHE.304080
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Writing an argument is an essential skill for doctoral students in achieving academic and occupational success. Writing an argument effectively requires the ability to use correct writing mechanics, but doctoral students may tend to think their writing mechanics are better than they are, and their ability to write an argument effectively may be compromised as a result. At one university, this gap between student perceptions of their ability to write and their writing performance appeared to exist. A study was conducted to determine whether there was a mismatch between perceived writing self-efficacy and writing performance. Study results showed that higher perceived writing self-efficacy seems to be associated with certain mechanical writing errors, including wordiness and inaccurate grammar. Knowing this mismatch between writing self-efficacy and writing performance may exist is important (a) for students in terms of their awareness, and (b) for tertiary educators to better target tertiary writing interventions.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Writing grammatically correct, clear, correctly punctuated, and well-structured text is a valuable skill. However, employers reportedly have a difficult time finding qualified candidates who can write clearly, which is an essential skill for graduates in the 21st Century (Holland, 2013; Schartel et al., 2019). Interestingly, “academic writing…is gaining recognition as an area that all students need support in, regardless of linguistic or educational background” (Wilmot, 2018, p. 258). In 2006, the Chronicle of Higher Education published a study indicating that college professors felt students were unprepared for college-level writing. If students entering college have limited writing skills, students’ likelihood of success in academic writing activities is low (Sanoff, 2006). Poor writing skills have implications for students in terms of their professional careers. Schartel, Dunn, and Lane (2019) found, in their research, that supervisors felt recent graduates were ill prepared in terms of writing skills, grammar, and proofreading skills. In this same study, supervisors rated proofreading and correct grammar at a higher importance than interns (Schartel et al., 2019).

Some researchers have related the lack of writing skills to the proliferation of social technologies and casual communication formats such as texting and instant messaging. In particular, grammatical mistakes in formal writing have been significantly related to the use of social technologies (Purcell et al., 2013; Shafi et al., 2010; Turner, 2009). As students tend to use these same casual communication formats in writing assignments, providing students with feedback on their writing is necessary for improvement. The form of this feedback can vary, including writing improvement strategies and online grammar checkers. With this said, understanding the extent of poor writing among doctoral students, perceived writing self-efficacy, writing improvement strategies, and online grammar checkers can offer an option to students as a means of assessing the accuracy of their written work.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 5: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 4: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 3: 1 Issue (2022)
Volume 2: 1 Issue (2021)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (2020)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing