A Novel Approach for Solving a Fully Rough Multi-Level Quadratic Programming Problem and Its Application

A Novel Approach for Solving a Fully Rough Multi-Level Quadratic Programming Problem and Its Application

A. A. Abohany, Rizk Masoud Rizk-Allah, Diana T. Mosa, Aboul Ella Hassanien
DOI: 10.4018/IJSSMET.2020100109
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The most widely used actions and decisions of the real-world tasks frequently appear as hierarchical systems. To deal with these systems, the multi-level programming problem presents the most flourished technique. However, practical situations involve some the impreciseness regarding some decisions and performances; RST provides a vital role by considering the lower and upper bounds of any aspect of uncertain decision. By preserving the advantages of it, in the present study, solving fully rough multi-level quadratic programming problems over the variables, parameters of the objective functions, and the constraints such as rough intervals are focused on. The proposed approach incorporates the interval method, slice-sum method, Frank and Wolfe algorithm, and the decomposition algorithm to reach optimal values as rough intervals. The proposed is validated by an illustrative example, and also environmental-economic power dispatch is investigated as a real application. Finally, the proposed approach is capable of handling the fully rough multi-level quadratic programming models.
Article Preview
Top

Pawlak (1982) introduced an approach for uncertain administration called, RST. This method presented a great sign in the areas of image processing, machine learning, data mining, artificial intelligence, medical applications and multiple other fields (Nasiri, 2009; Rizk-Allah, 2018; Hassanien, 2018; Pramanik, 2015).

Youness (2006) introduced a Non-Linear Problems (NLPs)with rough constraints. Even though, presented new concepts like a convex rough set, local and global rough optimal solution, and roughness measure of optimality with NLPs. Osman et al. (2011) presented a new form of Rough Programming Problems (RPPs). Even though defined a rough feasibility, optimality, optimal set, and value.

Hamazehee et al. (2014) presented an approach for solving Linear Programming Problems (LPPs) with rough intervals (RIs) parameters and explained that each one of them can be decomposed into four LPPs with interval parameters. Even though defined a surely, possibly optimal range and completely and rather satisfactory solutions.

Ammar and Khalifa (2014) introduced a new approach for solving Rough Interval Multi-Objective Transportation (RIMOT) called, separation method. In this method, transportation cost, demand, and supply are in the form of RIs. Even though, presented the separation method as an essential methodology for the DMs when discussing different types of logistic transportation problems having coefficients in the form of RIs.

Osman et al. (2016) introduced an approach for solving RIMOTP problems. The solution methodology is based on conventional interval programming and fuzzy programming. Pandian et al. (2016) formulated Rough Integer Interval Transportation Problem (RIITP). Even though, an approach named a slice-sum is presented to find the solution for RIITP. In this form, transportation cost, demand, and supply are in the form of rough integer intervals.

Emam et al. (2016) introduced a new solution methodology for fully rough three level large-scale integer linear programming problem with RIs decision parameters and variables in the objective functions and constraints. The solution approach is depended on the interval method and slice-sum method in an interactive environment to reach a compromised solution for fully rough three level large-scale integer linear programming problem (Lai, 1995).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 6 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 4 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing