This recommends avoiding direct involvement in an open-ended conflict with Russia on behalf of Ukraine. Instead, it advocates more comprehensive support for Ukraine and other countries in the so-called Rimland, the region surrounding the Heartland (Russia and China). In this context, Brzezinski’s work proposes expediting covert efforts across various domains—military, political, logistical, diplomatic, humanitarian, and material—against enemies. All these efforts are aimed at supporting these countries on their transatlantic route because only such an outcome can truly bring peace and stability to Eastern Europe, the Balkans, the Caucasus, and the rest of the world (Inspired by: Pietrzak, 2024b ; Pietrzak, 2023b ).
Published in Chapter:
The Geoeconomics of NATO's Responses to Russia's Invasion of Ukraine (2022-Present)
Piotr Pietrzak (Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski, Bulgaria & In Statu Nascendi Think Tank, Bulgaria)
Copyright: © 2024
|Pages: 38
DOI: 10.4018/979-8-3693-2837-8.ch001
Abstract
This chapter critically examines the unfolding dynamics of NATO's eastern flank in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine (2022-present). It underscores the paramount importance of NATO's defensive role and rigorously investigates the organization's robust response to the aggression, specifically in the proactive extension of both informal and formal support to Ukraine. The study delves into the geoeconomic considerations influencing the conflict, examining the impact on global geopolitics, economic trends, and the divergence of policies within NATO. Furthermore, the chapter introduces hypotheses, proposing a fundamental shift in the global economic relations. It discusses the role of democratic peace theory and the limitations of Putin's objectives in Ukraine and suggests the unlikelihood of a nuclear escalation in this conflict even if it worsens. The research underscores the complexity of decision-making amid geopolitical and geoeconomic intricacies, emphasizing the need for nuanced analysis beyond the battlefield.