There have been noticed difficulty and inconsistency of the use of those intellectual capital valuation models proposed by intellectual capital specialists when they were applied in practice in other companies and/or in other domains, which led to the idea that the findings did not meet the expectations, although, at least intuitively, they were considered to have the potential to generate concrete results.
Published in Chapter:
Measuring Progress Towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Creativity, Intellectual Capital, and Innovation
Cristina Raluca Gh. Popescu (University of Bucharest, Romania & The Bucharest University of Economic Studies, Romania & University of Craiova, Romania & The National Institute for Research and Development in Environmental Protection (INCDPM), Romania & National Research and Development Institute for Gas Turbines (COMOTI), Romania)
Copyright: © 2021
|Pages: 12
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8426-2.ch006
Abstract
In the modern, knowledge-based economy, it is believed that mastering the methods and tools for assessing intellectual capital and capitalizing on intellectual capital influence on economic performance are essential criteria. In addition, it has been prompted that the key issues specific to performance are directly related to those of intellectual capital measurement, having to respond to the challenges of a new economy and sustainable world, built through alliances not only locally, regionally, and nationally, but also internationally – only from this perspective being able to approach performance and the idea that, in time, performance will have the potential to lead to the necessary, but sinuous and difficult road, to excellence. This chapter explores this in relation to the Sustainable Development Goals.