The Broader Benefits of Teaching Language and Literacy to Students Across the Autism Spectrum

The Broader Benefits of Teaching Language and Literacy to Students Across the Autism Spectrum

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-9442-1.ch010
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter reviews the broader benefits of teaching language and literacy to individuals across the autism spectrum. It discusses how language empowers communication in general and language instruction in particular. It discusses how language can also reduce frustration and anxiety and mitigate challenging behaviors. It then discusses various connections between linguistic and cognitive skills and processes and how these connections suggest ways in which language learning may increase cognitive flexibility and abstract thinking. Next, it turns to the crucial role of language in accessing the classroom curriculum, in boosting social engagement and perspective taking skills and providing opportunities for social learning. It concludes with a discussion of why individuals with autism are especially dependent on language.
Chapter Preview
Top

The Broader Benefits Of Language And Literacy Instruction

Empowering Communication and Jumpstarting Language Instruction

The most obvious benefit of language is that it empowers communication. At the most basic level, it empowers requests—e.g., for basic wants and needs. Beyond requests, it enables a variety of other linguistic acts: commenting, reminiscing, making future plans, asking questions, speculating. To perform these acts successfully, specific aspects of language are key: for commenting, among other things, a vocabulary of descriptive adjectives; for reminiscing, facility with past tense; for future plans, facility with future tense; for questions, facility with the complex syntax of questions; for speculating, the acquisition of conditional terms like “if,” probabilistic terms like “maybe,” and the syntax of conditional statements.

Then there is comprehension. The more language a language-impaired individual comprehends, the easier it is for his teachers to teach him more. At the beginning stages of instruction, the child’s comprehension empowers teachers to ask the child to “look at me” or otherwise verbally direct his attention to the focus of instruction. The direction to “look at me,” as we saw, is one of the first instructional prompts in the ABA teaching protocol and, when understood, can set in motion a series of teaching and learning opportunities—a virtuous cycle for language learning.

Reducing Frustration and Anxiety

Once a child has enough language to express basic wants and needs, he also has a major tool for mitigating the frustration and anxiety that are all too common in autism. After all, a common source of both frustration and anxiety is the inability to satisfy one’s basic wants and needs. In autism, basic wants and needs are often a function of sensory sensitivities, perseverative preoccupations, an extreme need for order and predictability, and a narrowness of focus that makes small details that most people do not even notice highly salient and potentially upsetting. Thus, compared with the wants and needs of typical children, those of autistic children are often far less transparent—crying out for clear verbal articulation.

Improving comprehension, which as we have seen is a major weakness in autism, can also reduce frustration. After all, a common source of frustration is not being able to understand what others say. On the flipside, when a child understands enough language, others can warn him ahead of time about unexpected changes (e.g., an upcoming fire drill), as well as explain reasons for unexpected or aversive occurrences (e.g., why we’re all getting out of a broken-down vehicle in the middle of a trip). Lack of access to explanations and warnings makes the world a much scarier, more unpredictable place—particularly for those who depend on structure and routines for their emotional well-being.

Even in situations where frustration or anxiety nevertheless arises, language still can come in handy—specifically for talking through those frustrations or anxious moments with others.

Most of the studies on language skills and emotional well-being are not specific to autistic individuals. Yet various studies, as we saw in Chapter 1, have found that language delays and deficits predict subsequent levels of anxiety, depression, sleep problems, and problems with emotion regulation. Given the above considerations, there is reason to suspect that such associations also occur in autism.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Cognitive Flexibility: The ability to switch between mental processes—e.g., to sort cards first by one criterion (shape), and then, in response to changes in implicit feedback, by another criterion (color). Several studies show this shifting ability to be impaired in autism.

Educational Access: The availability of the educational offerings of the education system, or the ability to benefit from those offerings. Educational access depends, among other things, on having the receptive language skills needed to understand lessons, assignments, and directions, and the expressive language skills needed to complete assignments, take tests, and participate in class.

Counterfactual Conditionals: Conditionals that express false premises, e.g., “If there were a tooth fairy…”

Functional Communication Training (FCT): Addressing problematic behaviors by teaching the person exhibiting these behaviors to use language as an alternative means of achieving whatever goal is motivating him or her.

Perspective Taking: The ability to intuit or calculate the perspective of another person, particularly when that person’s perspective, including their state of knowledge, is different from one’s own. Multiple studies suggest that automatic, intuitive perspective taking, also called “mentalizing,” is impaired in autism.

Theory of Mind: The ability to intuit or calculate other people’s thoughts and feelings. Theory of Mind includes perspective taking but is often used in a broader sense to include the ability to infer people’s emotions from facial expressions and tones of voice.

False-Belief Test: A test of the ability to calculate another person’s false belief. A common type of false belief test involves an unexpected location change, as in the so-called “Sally-Anne” test: Sally moves a marble from a basket to a box while Anne is out of the room, such that Anne believes, falsely, that the marble is still in the basket.

Sentential Complements: Embedded sentences that serve as subjects or objects within larger sentences. For example, “the marble is in the basket” is an embedded complement of the verb “think” in “Sally thinks the marble is in the basket.”

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset