Technological Application to Managing a Municipal Urban Garden

Technological Application to Managing a Municipal Urban Garden

Fernando Almeida, Nuno Miranda, Bruno Vieira
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8900-7.ch007
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The implementation of urban gardens, which are increasingly appearing in cities, aims to respond actively to the growing demand for urban spaces for the installation of urban gardens, creating conditions for the practice of sustainable agriculture in an urban context. Through these initiatives, it is intended to ensure that the needs of the population are met and to maximize the benefits arising from the practice of urban agriculture, both for the environment and for people's quality of life. Technology is a facilitating element in the process of acquiring and maintaining these urban gardens. This chapter presents an app that can be used by farmers to manage the production of consumer goods in this space, providing information about the status of crops, products to be grown, and types of required maintenance. This app simplifies the production process and also increases the sustainability of agriculture activities considering the economic, social, and logistical dimensions.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The progressive global migration of the rural population to large urban centers has contributed to the emergence of environmental, social, and economic problems (Østby, 2016). With this migratory flow to large cities, populations seek to improve their quality of life without considering the possible irreversible damage to the environment. A key concern in the planning and management of cities is to ensure sustainable development. Sachs and Ki-moon (2015) advocate that sustainable development seeks to respond to the ecological limits of the planet, which are not infinite, and it is also necessary to ensure the existence of natural resources for future generations.

Sustainable cities are those that align their living, production, and consumption patterns based on a combination of economic and socio-environmental aspects. As Cohen (2017) argues, instead of promoting disorderly growth and consumption, they adopt public policies and actions that positively impact sustainability. This can be realized in different areas of intervention in cities such as mobility, education, energy, and environment (Saad et al., 2017; Tafidis et al., 2017; Trindade et al., 2017). It becomes unequivocal that sustainability is a purpose for all humanities since consumption habits are driving natural resources to depletion, besides destroying flora and fauna species.

The rapid growth of cities has led to the massification and industrialization of production processes. This situation has led to the loss of food quality, which leads people to increasingly value the food from organic and healthy agriculture (Kearney, 2010). As a result of this process, urban agriculture presents progressively as an important alternative for feeding the population that allows ensuring sustainable development in urban space (Chumbler et al., 2016). Several differences can be found between urban agriculture and agriculture in rural areas, of which location stands out as an evident differentiating element between these two concepts, and a few improvements, where the objective of food production may be considered the most common element. Despite the differences between these types of agriculture, they can be seen as complementary. Rural agriculture provides food in large quantities, while urban agriculture exploits a few niche markets that are often overlooked in rural agriculture (Hamlin et al., 2016).

Agriculture has been enhancing the city with its multi-functionalities, which goes beyond food production and benefits other elements of the urban environment, such as services, green areas, buildings, leisure spaces, among others. Several authors have debated the benefits resulting from this activity. Heather (2012) mentions that at the environmental level, urban agriculture promotes the development of green spaces, the recovery of degraded areas, and the reduction of pollution. At the economic level, urban gardens contribute to the reduction of probity, because they enable the harvesting of food, of good quality and for personal consumption (Krikser et al., 2019).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Unified Modelling Language (UML): Modeling language for specifying the construction of a software system.

Human Capital: The capacity of a person's knowledge, skills, and personality attributes to perform work in order to produce economic value.

Open Standard: Open access standards that allow for implementation and communication without the adoption of royalties or other fees that might inhibit their use.

Focus Group: Group interview-based research method that aims to obtain information and opinions quickly. It can involve different actors and the number of participants is typically small.

Optical Fiber: Flexible filaments made of transparent materials such as glass or plastic fibers that are used as a light propagation medium. Optical fibers are generally very and have many applications, data transmission being one of the most common.

Internet of Things: Technology that enables inanimate objects to connect, store, and perform functions of all kinds. The core idea of IoT is to make things smarter and more connected.

Agriculture 4.0: Set of state-of-the-art digital technologies integrated and connected by means of software, systems, and equipment capable of optimizing agricultural production, in all its stages.

XML: A markup language recommended by the W3C for creating documents with hierarchically organized data, such as text, databases, or vector drawings. The XML language is classified as extensible because it allows defining markup elements.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset