Problem-Based Learning Classroom Models in Higher Education

Problem-Based Learning Classroom Models in Higher Education

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-7998-8177-3.ch007
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter will introduce the reader to a variety of models that can be used to develop a problem-based learning program. The models range from a simple three-step model in which the problem is first defined. Then a solution is researched and implied, and finally, the solution is evaluated to determine if it was the correct choice or if another answer needs to be found. As each additional model is discussed, a new phase is attached. In the four-step model, research is added; in the five-step model, brainstorming; and in the six-step model, presentation of the results is the added phase. The last two models, seven- and eight-step models, are both more student centered than the others. The pair focus on the students' ability to use self-direction and problem solve, whereas the previous models more or less assume the students already apply these skills.
Chapter Preview
Top

Background

Within any institute of higher education, objectives are established for each course that must be followed for accreditation purposes and so that students understand what they are to learn in the course. A PBL program is no exception to this rule. Before any type of model can be considered, stakeholders looking to establish a PBL program (e.g., professors, faculty members, administrators, community partners) need to have in place solid objectives so that everyone involved understands the direction in which the program is headed. Veldman et al. (2008) provided some guidelines to accomplish this goal.

According to Veldman et al. (2008), eight objectives must be included in the PBL program curricula in order to make the program successful. Objective 1 is to “identify and solve problems, and make decisions using critical and creative thinking” (Veldman et al., 2008, p. 552). In some models, the professors or faculty members give the students the problem to solve, but in others, the university educator provides an idea and the students develop their own problem. Regardless of how the problem is derived, all PBL programs must start with some type of issue to figure out. For Objective 2—“work effectively with others as members of a team, group, organization, and community” (Veldman et al., 2008, p. 552)—all students are expected to work collaboratively within their group. Although some students may have experience operating within this objective, others may have little or almost no expertise. It is important that the instructor gets to know the participants in the class and figure out who may need additional support. Once all have the knowledge and skills to work together, the team should operate smoothly.

Veldman et al. (2008) suggested that in Objective 3, students need to “organize and manage themselves and their activities responsibly and effectively” (p. 552). Part of being involved in the collective is setting deadlines as a group and ensuring that everyone contributes to meeting the goals the team sets. For some students this may be an easy task, but for others it could be a challenge. As in the second objective, the professor or faculty member may need to provide additional support and resources in order for everyone in the group to be on the same page. Once everyone in the collective understands how to act together to communicate and work toward a common goal, Objective 4, “collect, analyze, organize, and critically evaluate information” (Veldman et al., 2008, p. 552), should be set in motion. In an ideal PBL program, each student collects data and information on their own about the problem and then brings it to the group to share. However, if some members of the group have never conducted research on their own, the instructor may need to step in and provide assistance, either by directly providing certain information or by directing the student to articles that the pupil can read on their own. Objective 4 is a very important step because the collective cannot move forward until the required information has been properly disseminated.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Cyclical: Completing tasks in order and when at the end repeating them again (e.g., 1, 2, 3; 1, 2, 3; etc.).

Collective: A group of individuals working toward the same goal.

Content: The main substance within a written work.

Authentic Problem: A problem to solve that is real and accurate.

Troubleshoot: Brainstorming or coming up with ideas or ways to solve the problem (typically completed in a group setting).

Task Analysis: Breaking an assignment or job into smaller parts so one can easily master them. One part must be completed prior to moving on to the next.

Community Members: A group of people or an organization within the local community who share an interest in working with the PBL program of a particular discipline for the sole purpose of evaluating the solution to the issue.

Reflection: Thinking about the PBL process one has recently experienced and placing thoughts, ideas, and opinions about the process on paper to share with other members of the group or the professor.

Real-Life Problems: Problems to solve that are related to actual scenarios or occurrences.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset