Development of a Socioeconomic Inclusive Assessment Framework for Online Learning in Higher Education

Development of a Socioeconomic Inclusive Assessment Framework for Online Learning in Higher Education

Chorng Yuan Fung, Sueh Ing Su, Esther John Perry, Manuel B. Garcia
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 24
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-4364-4.ch002
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Higher education institutions worldwide were compelled to deliver their courses online due to mobility restrictions and lockdowns during the COVID-19 pandemic. This sudden shift has disrupted the educational system leaving millions unprepared for the new mode of instruction. One critical area that received little attention during this transition is student assessment. Many assessment methods designed for face-to-face classes have been adapted for online learning without much consideration. The conversion to emergency remote education has likewise exacerbated existing and uncovered new socioeconomic issues that demand immediate action. A scoping review has been carried out to map the concepts and develop a socioeconomic inclusive assessment framework for online learning in higher education. This framework will serve as a guide in designing assessment tasks that are more socioeconomically inclusive, making online learning more equitable. This chapter offers practical implications for developing a more inclusive assessment design that is beneficial to a broader group of students.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

The mobility restrictions imposed by governments to fight the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak have forced academic institutions to adapt to the new normal by transferring physical classrooms to various digital platforms (Garcia & Revano, 2022; Khan, Kambris, & Alfalahi, 2022; Lemay et al., 2021; Pokhrel & Chhetri, 2021). Since March 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic has brought many unprecedented challenges leaving drastic and profound effects on the education landscape (Lungu & Lungu, 2021; Zdravkova & Krasniqi, 2021). Following school closures due to nationwide lockdowns, many students were exposed to the shortcomings of emergency remote education, such as the lack of infrastructure, low teaching and learning quality, non-conducive learning environment at home, poor internet service, and mental health issues, and limited exposure to online instruction. Teachers face similar challenges but with additional difficulties including intensified workloads particularly in moving all face-to-face learning materials into the online space (Allen et al., 2020; Lin & Yeh, 2022; Treceñe, 2022). The paradigm shift in instruction delivery likewise compelled academic institutions to come up with policies to ensure a continuous high-quality education (Khusanov et al., 2022; Xu & Ma, 2021).

Despite these tremendous efforts, transitioning from traditional face-to-face to online learning has intensified the gaps and inequalities in accessing equal learning opportunities among diverse social groups (Iyer et al., 2022; Pittman et al., 2021; Zdravkova & Krasniqi, 2021). Undeniably, a significant number of students are still denied comparable opportunities in this new learning environment. For instance, in the case of South Africa, Dube (2020) reported that both students and teachers in rural areas face problems of limited network coverage and a shortage of devices. To mitigate these problems, he proposed an inclusive approach to online teaching and learning as the COVID-19 pandemic has widened the gap between the rich and poor and those in rural and urban areas. This challenge has demanded practitioners, governments, and stakeholders to work on urgent interventions so that no learners are left behind. Additionally, Hevia et al. (2022) asserted that school closure has resulted in learning loss and an increase in learning poverty, especially in the poorest countries with economically disadvantaged students. One of the potential approaches to mitigating the present problem is by taking an inclusive approach where students are afforded opportunities to continue their education. The inclusive approach goes beyond the original intention to meet the needs of physical disabilities as it now has been extended to include a multi-faceted education (Zdravkova & Krasniqi, 2021). In this renewed version of inclusive education, not only academic support, acceptance, and leadership are the criteria of inclusivity but also the availability of resources and tools in providing equal and fair educational opportunities to learners of diverse backgrounds (Mitchell, 2015). More importantly, socioeconomic factors play an essential role in this new model of inclusive education because they are determinants of student achievement and educational outcomes in general. Given the drastic changes and challenges mentioned above, adopting a socioeconomic inclusive approach to online education is necessary. Socioeconomic inclusion in the context of online education emphasizes the necessity of addressing various needs that could arise due to differences (e.g., income, religion, ethnicity, wealth, social support, and community safety). Hence, a socioeconomic inclusive approach entails the promotion of an equal opportunity policy for students regardless of needs, resources, or backgrounds.

Key Terms in this Chapter

Inclusive Education: It refers to an approach to providing learning opportunities to all learners and catering to diverse learning preferences, abilities, and/or socio-economic backgrounds specifically in the context of higher learning institutions and online education.

Framework: A set of rules, principles, or beliefs that underpins a system, task, or work.

Inclusive Pedagogy: It refers to the method of education that is designed by taking into account the diverse background of learners to ensure that everyone has an engaging learning experience through significant and inclusive assessments.

Assessment Feedback: It refers to the responses, either in verbal or written form, given to the students about their performance in the assessments given.

Assessment Methods: It refers to the tools and approaches to assessing students’ performance or learning in achieving the learning outcomes.

Higher Education: It refers to the formal education at the tertiary level and/or post-secondary level(s).

Socioeconomic Inclusion: It refers to the educational practice wherein students from diverse social and economic backgrounds are afforded equal educational opportunities, particularly in the context of online education.

Online Assessment: It refers to an assessment task requiring the learner to access the internet and complete it either synchronously or asynchronously.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset