Balanced Scorecard in Business Dynamic Environments: Benefits Management Approach

Balanced Scorecard in Business Dynamic Environments: Benefits Management Approach

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-6684-9261-1.ch002
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In the rapidly changing environments characterizing most industries today, organizations face intense competitive pressure to do things better, faster, and cheaper. The business environment of the 1990s has been subjected to rapid and accelerated change that creates more and more uncertainty and complexity. Most markets are becoming increasingly dynamic. Organizations can no longer rely on a traditional analytical approach to understand their industry or market, since that market is changing in rapid and unexpected ways. Despite its worldwide dissemination, balanced scorecard (BSC) has demonstrated inadequacy in certain circumstances. Some of the original advantages of the BSC can nowadays be interpreted as weaknesses. By using a case study, the authors suggest that in business dynamic environments the benefits management approach, by using the benefits dependency network, can help BSCs to guide and support the benefits achievement related with investments, in a complementary way.
Chapter Preview
Top

Introduction

Organizations today face intense competitive pressure to do things better, faster and cheaper. Most markets are becoming increasingly dynamic; organizations cannot rely on an analytical approach to understanding their industry or market, since that market is changing in rapid and unexpected ways. Equally, they cannot rely on the collection of resources that have provided them with competitive advantage in the past. Rather, they must learn to develop capabilities that allow them to integrate, reconfigure, gain and release resources (Eisenhardt and Martin, 2000). If these resources, competencies and capabilities are valuable, rare, inimitable and non-substitutable they can be used to implement value creating strategies that will provide sustainable competitive advantage (Barney, 1991; Priem & Butler, 2001; Wernerfelt, 1984). “If the firm has a dynamic capability, it must perform well, and if the firm is performing well, it should have a dynamic capability” (Cepeda & Vera, 2007, p. 427).

With a shift from the industrial economy towards a new economy that is now predominantly characterized by intangible assets, such as knowledge and innovative capability, organizations must manage increasing levels of complexity, mobility and uncertainty (Voelpel et al. 2005). The ability to manage knowledge-based intellect is of critical important in this new environment (Quinn, 1992). The economic trends of the 21st century focus on the the value and importance that intangible assets, namely, knowledge can provide to companies. The importance of knowledge and information for economic prosperity has been recognized around the world (Cooke & Leydesdorff, 2006).

Competition in this new economy is now increasingly characterized by the rapid emergence of brand-owning companies that devote their energies to organizational fitness (Beer, 2002). The uncertainty and high turbulence of the environment have forced companies and organizations in general to pay special attention to those strategies or management processes that are most likely to guarantee their success and to help them achieve sustainable competitive advantages over time (Cepeda-Carrion et al., 2017).

For many companies’ competitive advantage is a continuous process of performance improvements and search for better practices and development of new capabilities. This includes a search for more efficient process technologies, new or improved products and procedures in the manufacturing process but also development of dynamic capabilities (Teece, Pisano and Shuen 1997) to respond and adapt to change and new trends in the sector. Prahalad and Hamel (1990) argue that sustainable competitive advantage is dependent upon building and exploiting core competences. For many organizations the competitive advantage is a continuous performance improvement in a search for best practices and the development of new capabilities (Vorhies & Morgan, 2005). Looking for higher efficiency organizations change and create new processes, produce organizational changes, implement new systems and technologies, introduce new products and services and also develop dynamic capabilities (Teece et al., 1997) to give a quick response to permanent market changes.

Porter's work emphasizes the need for firms and countries to broaden and upgrade their internal advantages to sustain and extend competitive advantages (Porter 1991, 1992).

Firms obtain sustained competitive advantage by implementing strategies that exploit their internal strengths through responding to environmental opportunities, improving internal weaknesses and eliminated the external threats (Barney, 1991).

For managers the challenge is to identify, develop, protect, and deploy resources and capabilities in a way that provides the firm with a sustainable competitive advantage and, thereby, a superior return on capital (Amit & Schoemaker, 1993).

Key Terms in this Chapter

Hypercompetition: Meaning very intense levels of competition.

Dynamic Capabilities: The dynamic capabilities approach as ways of exploiting existing internal and external firm specific competences to address changing investments.

Investment objectives: Organizational targets for achievement agreed for the investment in relation to the drivers. As a set they are essentially a description of what the situation should be on completion of the investment.

Resource Based-View: The RBV approach sees the firm as a collection of unique resource and capability pools that, if utilised in a distinctive way, can be employed to create and preserve competitive advantage.

Benefits Management: The process of organizing and managing such that the potential benefits arising from the use of IS/IT are actually realized.

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset