Accessibility of Research Data at Academic Institutions in Zimbabwe

Accessibility of Research Data at Academic Institutions in Zimbabwe

Blessing Chiparausha, Josiline Phiri Chigwada
Copyright: © 2019 |Pages: 9
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-8437-7.ch004
OnDemand:
(Individual Chapters)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This chapter presents the findings of an online survey that was carried out to assess research data accessibility at research and academic institutions in Zimbabwe. The study primarily sought to ascertain the custodianship, storage and accessibility of research data at these institutions. The chapter also highlights the challenges associated with accessing research data in Zimbabwe and proposes mechanisms that can be put in place to address these challenges.
Chapter Preview
Top

Objectives Of The Study

The study sought to specifically answer the following research questions:

  • 1.

    Who is responsible for managing the data?

  • 2.

    Where is the research data stored?

  • 3.

    Who can access the research data?

  • 4.

    What are the challenges associated with accessing the research data?

Research Data Custodianship

Whyte, Jones and Pryor (2014) and Corrall (2012) observe that although roles and responsibilities in RDM have not yet been clearly spelt out, libraries and librarians are taking a leading role in assuming responsibility for research data. She points out that university librarians are participating in activities that assist researchers in accessing research data. Corrall (2012), however, notes that apart from librarians, there are other key players who have been involved in RDM; information and computer scientists, database and software engineers and programmers, disciplinary experts, curators and expert annotators and archivists. In the context of RDM, these professionals are collectively referred to as ‘data scientists’ and the same study also confirms collaboration amongst the various professionals in RDM (Corrall 2012:106). Some researchers however, continue to prefer keep research data themselves on their desktops, laptops and other devices at their disposal (Procter, Halfpenny and Voss 2012).

Findings from the survey show that researchers are primarily responsible for managing their own research data in academic institutions in Zimbabwe as shown in Figure 1; this is in line with what was stated by Procter, Halfpenny and Voss (2012). Figure 1 also shows that other stakeholders such as librarians, information technology personnel, research officers and records managers are also involved in RDM in Zimbabwe; RDM calls for a team effort to ensure that the data is accessible and reusable. Collaboration is also important to ensure that that there is no duplication of effort. The FAIR principle calls on the research community to ensure that research data is Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Reusable (GO FAIR International Support and Coordination Office 2018). The FAIR principle can only be applied if all stakeholders are involved in ensuring that data is archived correctly and securely.

Figure 1.

Research data management responsibilities

978-1-5225-8437-7.ch004.f01

Complete Chapter List

Search this Book:
Reset