Using Online Gaming as a Teacher Test Prep Model for Mathematics

Using Online Gaming as a Teacher Test Prep Model for Mathematics

Shirley A. Disseler, Tawannah G. Allen
DOI: 10.4018/IJSITA.2016070104
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In 2015, North Carolina's Division of Teacher Licensure instituted a new licensure examination modeled after the MTel for all elementary education majors. With the new examination came a new minimum passing score of 227. The importance of having a thorough understanding of the mathematics content is expected, yet teacher preparation programs struggle to help elementary pre-service teacher candidates who enter undergraduate programs without the solid mathematics foundations needed to be successful in passing the North Carolina General Curriculum Mathematics Licensure test. With this problem serving as the backdrop, the purpose of this quantitative study was to examine if utilizing Lost Functions, an online gaming program developed by ATLT Gaming (2010), could serve as an innovative methodology to prepare teacher education candidates for the General Curriculum Mathematics Licensure test in elementary mathematics, possibly resulting in improved performance outcomes.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Growing concerns about chronic mediocre performance by American students on mathematics high-stakes tests have now called into question how teacher preparation programs are preparing future teachers to teach mathematics at the elementary, middle, and high school levels. How well teachers know math content is central to their capacity to use instructional materials wisely, to access students’ progress, and to make sound judgments about instructional presentation (Ball, Hill, & Bass, 2005). In an era of over-reliance of high stakes standardized assessment, schools, teachers, and students are being defined based upon assessment results. This assessment, coupled with the new implementation of a mathematics licensure test for elementary candidates in North Carolina, has prompted schools of education to re-examine the way in which current pre-service candidates are prepared for the licensure examination and to understand the amount of math content required to pass the examination.

Improving the instructional quality—primarily developing a rigorous curriculum—has typically overshadowed the practice of teaching (Ball et al., 2005). In 2016, the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction reported that from 2014 to 2015, the average pass rate for the General Curriculum Mathematics (GCM) subtest for North Carolina schools of education was 75%, while their 2015-2016 pass rates dipped to 59%. Table 1 highlights the GCM pass rates for schools of education located within a 100-mile radius from the site of this study.

Table 1.
GCM pass rates for selected North Carolina schools of education
North Carolina General Curriculum Mathematics Subtest Best Attemptby Institution for September 1, 2014 - August 31, 2015 and September 1, 2015 to Present
Best Attempt2014-20152015-Present
InstitutionPass RateNumber of Test TakersNumber of PassPass RateNumber of Test TakersNumber of Pass
A79%14611656%192108
B100%373794%3230
C69%161152%2111
D82%443656%2514
E58%241441%177
F50%261325%164
G95%747075%5340
H98%504995%3836
I56%794443%19282
J80%1189453%7439

Adapted from the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction, 2016.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Open Access Articles: Forthcoming
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing