Using Combination Technique for Land Cover Classification of Optical Multispectral Images

Using Combination Technique for Land Cover Classification of Optical Multispectral Images

Keerti Kulkarni, Vijaya P. A.
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/IJAGR.2021100102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The need for efficient planning of the land is exponentially increasing because of the unplanned human activities, especially in the urban areas. A land cover map gives a detailed report on temporal dynamics of a given geographical area. The land cover map can be obtained by using machine learning classifiers on the raw satellite images. In this work, the authors propose a combination method for the land cover classification. This method combines the outputs of two classifiers, namely, random forests (RF) and support vector machines (SVM), using Dempster-Shafer combination theory (DSCT), also called the theory of evidence. This combination is possible because of the inherent uncertainties associated with the output of each classifier. The experimental results indicate an improved accuracy (89.6%, kappa = 0.86 as versus accuracy of RF [87.31%, kappa = 0.83] and SVM [82.144%, kappa = 0.76]). The results are validated using the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), and the overall accuracy (OA) has been used as a comparison basis.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Survey

The literature survey for the problem statement was carried out in three different stages. In the first stage, the types of satellite images to be used, and the pre-processing required was explored. Literature in the second stage deals with a comparison of different machine learning classifiers and the parameters involved. In the third stage, validation mechanisms, and use of multiple classifiers was studied.

For the given problem statement, the use of multispectral images rather than hyperspectral images is more suitable. Literature (Ferrato & Forsythe 2013; Starovoitov & Makarau, 2008; Adam et al, 2010) have shown the difference between the two and how the choice of algorithms changes with the change in the source images. Atmosphere plays a major role in the values of the pixels which are reflected from the surface. Atmospheric correction is, hence an important pre-processing step. Dark Object Subtraction algorithms 1-4, and their pro and cons have been discussed by the authors (Song et al, 2001; Themistocleous, K et al, 2008). Correction for removal of atmospheric defects is important when the images are to be compared in a temporal manner. Radiometric and geometric corrections also form an important role in the LANDSAT images. It is important to identify the appropriate level of pre-processing and the removal of shadows and cloud cover (Young et al, 2017; Shrawankar 2016; Starovoitov & Makarau, 2008).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing