Toward a Significant E-Voting Adoption Model: The Digital Divide

Toward a Significant E-Voting Adoption Model: The Digital Divide

Mohammad Kamel Alomari, Habib Ullah Khan
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 16
DOI: 10.4018/IJTHI.300283
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

Technology, through internet use, has changed how citizens interact and communicate with their governments. However, in any society, a proportion of people cannot access this type of interaction due to digital divide issues. Consequently, this study developed a model by investigating the impact of digital divide factors on technological system adoption, that is, e-voting, mainly in Jordan, a developing country. The model proposes that four digital divide factors, namely age, education, income, and internet use, directly influence citizens' intentions to use an e-voting website. A survey study of 267 Jordanian citizens (and internet users) explored whether the digital divide e-voting adoption model was significant. Analysis of the collected data showed the model's significance for exploring the digital divide's impact on citizens' intentions to use an e-voting website. This study, with its focus on parliamentary elections, is one of the few to examine how the digital divide influences e-voting adoption in the Middle East. Future research will focus on municipality elections.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The inventions of the internet and the world wide web (www) have changed the nature of citizens’ interactions with their governments from traditional (face-to-face) to online interactive-based interaction. Two technological governmental initiatives provide evidence of this change: e-government and e-voting (alomari, 2018; alomari, woods, & sandhu, 2012; carter, weerakkody, phillips, & dwivedi, 2016; mensah & mi, 2018a; nu’man, 2012). E-voting is one technological innovation and e-government application that has drawn governments’ attention in both developed and developing countries to the importance of using the internet in political and governance processes (alomari, 2014a; carter & bélanger, 2005; idoughi & abdelhakim, 2018). Alomari (2016a) indicated that the “… government of jordan has viewed this initiative as an approach to enhance the democratic process by ensuring more participation by voters in choosing their representatives and leaders” (p.409). In different definitions of e-voting, citizens (voters) have been highlighted as the main stakeholders of the e-voting system. One definition introduced by alomari (2016b) stated that it is: “[a] mechanism through which voting processes are produced and delivered to citizens utilizing web-based internet applications” (p.527).

An e-voting system introduces advantages that can reduce the possible negative consequences of paper-based elections, such as ballot counting errors and manipulation of elections to suit the needs of particular candidates. These advantages are briefly summarized below:

  • An e-voting system automates the election process and therefore would reduce errors and election issues (Alomari, 2014).

  • An e-voting system “… not only save[s] time for voters, but also, by elevating the convenience in [the] election, raise[s] the percentage of people voting” (Chung & Zhen–Yu, 2012).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 7 Issues (2022): 4 Released, 3 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing