Article Preview
Top1. Introduction
Strengthening the partnership and collaboration between governments and private as well as civic sector actors has emerged as a strong demand of open government and of new public governance models (DGCONNECT, 2013, p. 6; Löffler & Timm-Arnold, 2013, p. 3). Along the demand, co-creation and co-production of public services arose as new trend to engage citizens and businesses more actively in public service design and public service provisioning. Different authors and institutions consider these concepts as important social and economic assets for the public sector (Bovaird, 2007; DGCONNECT, 2013; European Commission, 2013; Koch, Füller, & Brunswicker, 2011; Linders, 2012; Löffler & Timm-Arnold, 2013; Nam, 2012; Pestoff, 2006; Pestoff, Osborne, & Brandsen, 2006; Ramaswamy, 2009; Sorensen & Torfing, 2012). The wide diffusion of social technologies such as Web 2.0 and social media in the private and civic sectors (Nambisan & Nambisan, 2013, p. 12), and increasingly also in the public sector (Ferro, Loukis, Charalabidis, & Osella, 2013, p. 360; Mergel, 2012, p. 44) promote this evolution. However, governments are lagging behind in regard to a widely accepted use of such social technologies (Cassia & Magno, 2009, p. 334; Linders, 2012, p. 453; Sorensen & Torfing, 2012, pp. 843f).
While public administrations at all levels struggle with changing requirements demanding more transparency, better connectivity and collaboration among different actors (DGCONNECT, 2013), the concept of co-creation and co-production offers means to overcome these challenges. Yet, the use of the Internet, and of social and mobile technologies largely influence communication structures, expectations and behaviour of citizens and businesses (Nambisan & Nambisan, 2013, p. 8; Sorensen & Torfing, 2012, pp. 847f), which demands the public sector to carefully plan and deploy co-creation and co-production solutions. This requires well trained staff and a culture of social and open innovation at the side of the governments. However, another challenge the public sector has to cope with are financial constraints resulting in less staff available to keep pace with these fast developments in the digital era (Nambisan & Nambisan, 2013, p. 8).
To overcome above mentioned challenges and to leverage the potentials of co-creation and co-production, this contribution introduces a concept we call Social Government (SocialGov). The SocialGov concept aims to integrate methods, concepts and tools of co-creation and co-production with those of social communities and of open government. The concept aims to enable transparency, to explore open data, open services and open processes, and to integrate concepts of personalisation in the SocialGov environment. This way, innovative personalised open and collaborative public service provisioning is offered for social communities, where the different actors collaborate on the par among each other. SocialGov asks consumers of public services to take responsibility and to engage in public service provisioning alike - and with it in the society. The concept is also designed in a way that all stakeholders involved in this new co-creation and co-production paradigm benefit from the collaboration by bringing in expertise and insights from the different sides. Therewith, the SocialGov concept transforms the traditional paradigm of public service provisioning into a paradigm of co-creation and co-production.