Social Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Evidence From the Indian Manufacturing Sector: An Empirical Study

Social Sustainable Supply Chain Practices Evidence From the Indian Manufacturing Sector: An Empirical Study

Sri Yogi Kottala
DOI: 10.4018/IJSESD.2021040105
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Due to consistent surge strength in the form of legislations as well as a part of corporate social responsibility, companies in emerging economies like India need to synchronize. This is possible by implementing the concept of social sustainability in supply chain business activities. This paper investigated key factors influencing the adoption of social sustainability in supply chain activities of Indian manufacturing sector as a social development perspective. The present study covered literature review on sustainable supply chain covering social perspectives as well-chosen Indian manufacturing companies to investigate social perspectives. Social sustainability issues among Indian manufacturing companies using a structured questionnaire were investigated. Using the convenience sampling, 155 responses were collected as part of data collection and performed factor analysis, analysis of variance (ANOVA), and correlation to investigate and accomplish the research objectives. This paper investigated and found the following factors influencing the enactment of social sustainability in supply chain activities of Indian manufacturing sector as a social development perspective: community, safety, product responsibility, sustainable business opportunities. This study also investigated the relationship among different identified social sustainability practices in supply chain activities of manufacturing companies. The author has also proposed “house of social sustainable supply chain management practices” for Indian manufacturing sector. This paper proposed social sustainable factors to be implemented across the supply chain of the Indian manufacturing sector as it has been strong, pragmatic, and pertinent and can be conformed to by the organization with minimal changes in their prevailing work structure.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

As world is shrinking due to climate change, majority of industries including manufacturing as well as service oriented are making a drift in their business activities by incorporating the concept of social sustainability. Health and well being, nutrition, shelter education and cultural expression are essential priorities of a human being to live happily. “Sustainable development is defined as the development that meets the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs”, (World Commission on Environment and Development, 1987, also known as the Brundtland Commission). According to Phillip Sutton, “social sustainability is not “about” the integration of ecological, social and economic issues, nor is it “about” widespread”. Elkington (1997) conceptualized the expression ‘triple bottom line’ which has been adopted by majority of companies globally a method of corporate reporting that addresses environmental, social and economic perspective. However, the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI, established in 1997) has disclosed that GRI reporting on environmental index covering social performance is sparse and uncertain by organizations. Similar view by Western Australian Council of Social Services (WACOSS) that environmental economic issues are densely addressed however social aspects slipped from sustainability agenda. Linton et al. (2007) argues that legislations were adopted worldwide over a short span to phase out chemicals that effect ozone layer. Sikdar argues that prominent role of social, environmental, and economic aspects. According to him, sustainability is “a wise balance among economic development, environmental stewardship, and social equity” Sikdar (2003). Hutchins & Sutherland (2008) view of TBL approach embedded by economic, social and environmental dimensions acknowledged as three pillars of sustainability. However, limited studies directed on practice or implementation of social sustainability across the supply chain management of Indian manufacturing industries and implications are based on survey, statistical results, our research fixate using survey results proposed a house of for social sustainable supply chain management practices for Indian manufacturing sector a unique view. We developed scale items and measures for social sustainability.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 9 Issues (2022)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing