Review of Consumer-to-Consumer E-Commerce Research Collaboration

Review of Consumer-to-Consumer E-Commerce Research Collaboration

Chih-Hung Yuan, Chia-Huei Wu, Dajiang Wang, Shiyun Yao, Yingying Feng
Copyright: © 2021 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.20210701.oa8
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This study uses a content analysis method to systematically review 83 research papers from 2002-2018 to explore consumer-to-consumer (C2C) e-commerce research trends. The findings of this study indicate that (1) C2C e-commerce is discussed and investigated in many disciplines, but mainly published in e-commerce journals; (2) studies on C2C e-commerce increasingly focus on diverse topics, but concentrate on regions such as China and the United States; (3) the focus of academic collaboration has shifted from domestic to international collaboration, and collaboration within the same institution. However, collaboration is scarce across different study teams; (4) the data-driven approach is the main approach used in studies on C2C e-commerce; (5) while the number of recent C2C e-commerce studies adopted theories is increasing, few have developed theoretical frameworks or models. Finally, study implications and future study suggestions are also discussed.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

In recent years, global online retail transactions have witnessed a trend of continuous expansion, with a strong growth momentum. The proportion of online retail sales in total global retail sales is projected to increase from 8.6% in 2016 to 17.5% in 2021 at a growth rate far exceeding that of physical retail sales (eMarketer, 2018). In particular, consumer-to-consumer electronic commerce (C2C e-commerce) has become popular and it has experienced rapid development (Jones & Leonard, 2008; Wei, Li, Zha, & Ma, 2019). In this study, C2C e-commerce is defined as consumers selling products to other consumers through an online network. While the current growth rate of C2C e-commerce is not as fast as that of B2B and B2C e-commerce, the impact of the scale of C2C transactions should not be ignored (Leonard & Jones, 2010). A recent survey showed that in 2017, 19% of respondents from Europe had used the Internet at least once to sell goods or services to other consumers (Statista, 2018). According to the same report, 30% of respondents from the US had sold used goods via Facebook pages at least once in 2017. Under fierce competition, the scale of China’s C2C transactions accounted for 41.6% of the country’s online retail market in 2017, with a growth rate of 30.7% (Department of Electronic Commerce and Informatization of China, 2018). The booming C2C e-commerce market will not only attract more investment inflows and create new business models, but also upgrade consumer experience and drive market competition.

Therefore, the C2C model has become a major focus of research, with increasing number of publications by the academia. Researchers have explored the C2C model from multiple perspectives, such as trust (Joo, 2015; Wei et al., 2019; Yoon & Occeña, 2015), reputation (Dai, Viken, Joo, & Bente, 2018; Fan, Ju, & Xiao, 2016; Houser & Wooders, 2006), purchase intention (Jia, Cegielski, & Zhang, 2014), risk (Meents & Verhagen, 2018), interaction (Abdul-Ghani, Hyde, & Marshall, 2011), customer loyalty (Huang, Chen, Ou, Davison, & Hua, 2017), and rewards for providing feedback (Cabral & Li, 2015). The research site has shifted from e-commerce platforms (Cui, Zhang, & Lowry, 2017; Li, Li, & Lin, 2008) to social media (Chen, Su, & Widjaja, 2016; Chong, Lacka, Boying, & Chan, 2018; Li & Wang, 2018). As C2C-related research seems to be of sustainable interest, it is consistent with the purpose and intent of this study.

Previous review studies have focused on articles published in the Information Systems (IS) Journals and explored mainstream areas of research related to C2C (Cui, Lai, & Liu, 2008; Leonard & Jones, 2010). Cui et al. (2008) analyzed the development of consumer behavior using meta-analysis based on 83 articles on online auctions published in the IS journals between 1998 and 2007. Research results show that consumer research on online auctions can be divided into three categories: promotive factors, consumer behavior, and auction output. Similarly, Leonard and Jones (2010) found 2,291 e-commerce articles in the IS discipline during the period 1997–2009, of which research on C2C e-commerce accounted for only 10.86%. They have pointed out that the three main areas of research on C2C e-commerce are C2C, online auctions, and online communities.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing