Pandemic Participation: Revisiting Three Central Tenets of Good Practices in Participatory Mapping in Times of COVID-19

Pandemic Participation: Revisiting Three Central Tenets of Good Practices in Participatory Mapping in Times of COVID-19

Kelly Panchyshyn, Jon Corbett
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 12
DOI: 10.4018/IJEPR.299547
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

This article revisits the three foundational principles of Participatory Mapping practice identified in Good practices in participatory mapping. These include processes that strive for transparency, are unencumbered by time, and prioritize trust - the ‘Three T’s’. Authors Kelly Panchyshyn and Jon Corbett analyze the relevance of these principles under the spectre of the global COVID-19 pandemic. This reflection is carried out within the context of Kelly’s Master’s research. Over the course of 2020, Kelly worked with staff and citizens of the Kwanlin Dün First Nation to map Indigenous and non-Indigenous plant harvest foodways within Łu Zil Män, an expansive stretch of land on the edge of Whitehorse, Yukon. In exploring both the barriers and opportunities created by conducting this project during a pandemic, the authors determine that the ‘Three T’s’ remain essential for conducting meaningful participatory mapping. However, they also argue that each T takes on new dimensions within contexts of isolation and social distancing, particularly for Northern and Indigenous communities.
Article Preview
Top

Conceptual Framework

Participatory mapping, in its broadest sense, is the creation of maps, both paper and digital, by local experts (Corbett, 2009). The term ‘expert’ here, does not necessarily mean academics or government officials, rather, it means community members with the embedded knowledge and experience needed to map a particular place and the environmental or social histories embedded within it (Chambers, 2006).

Participatory maps represent unique ways of understanding and relating to space and place (Brown & Kyttä, 2018). These ways of knowing are rarely, if ever, depicted in mainstream maps or the planning initiatives informed by such maps. What unites practitioners is their belief that representing spatial knowledge and communicating it through the media of maps can have profound implications for those whose perspective of place and space are marginalized by conventional mapping (Tosi Roquette & McCall, 2021). When properly undertaken, maps produced by the community can become interactive conduits for networking, discussion, information exchange, analysis, and decision making (García-Díez et al., 2020). They can stimulate innovation, and ultimately, they can encourage positive social change.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 12: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 11: 1 Issue (2022)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2012)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing