Narrativization in Information Systems Development

Narrativization in Information Systems Development

Pasi Raatikainen, Samuli Pekkola, Maria Mäkelä
Copyright: © 2024 |Pages: 30
DOI: 10.4018/JDM.333471
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

People see the world and convey their perception of it with narratives. In an information system context, stories are told and collected when the systems are developed. Requirements elicitation is largely dependent on communication between systems designers and users. Thus, stories have a significant impact on conceptualizing future users' needs. This paper presents a literature review on how stories and narratives have been considered in central IS literature. Narrative-theoretical parameters are used as a lens to analyze the literature. This shows that explicit discussion is non-existent, and the characteristics are considered partially. The result is a biased and narrow understanding of the informants' needs and wishes. This may be significant in the requirements because narratives are not as simple a form of communication as is usually assumed. It is proposed that better understanding narratives would equip systems analysts with an in-depth understanding about the nuances inherent in communication when communicating with users.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Stories and narratives are a natural form of human interpretation and communication (Brown et al., 2008; Fisher, 1984; Raatikainen, 2023; Weick et al., 2005). Stories and narratives also appear in an information systems development (ISD) context where different techniques and methodologies are used to elicit users’ requirements, needs, and wishes (Alvarez & Urla, 2002). Our concern arises from a potential gap in the field's comprehensive understanding of the fundamental nature of these narratives.

Most elicitation methods rely on two-way verbal communication between systems analysts and users (Amna & Poels, 2022; Ferrari et al., 2022; Ramesh et al., 2010). Typically, requirements elicitation processes provoke competing interpretations about the system and the organisational context in which it is developed, implemented, and intended to be used (Davidson, 2002; Iivari et al., 2010). This makes requirements elicitation a vital yet problematic activity, as the failures often result from its difficulties (Bano et al., 2019; Beimel & Kedmi-Shahar, 2019; Coughlan & Macredie, 2002; Poels et al., 2013; Siau et al. 2022). Our concern lies in the possibility that the lack of a comprehensive understanding of narratives could contribute to these challenges.

Fundamentally, requirements elicitation is dependent on human communication and knowledge transfer (Appan & Browne, 2012; Bano et al., 2019; Holmström & Sawyer, 2011; Palomeres et al., 2022; Oran et al., 2021; Rosenkranz et al., 2014). Developers try to understand the context and users’ needs so that the system fits the situation (Kirsch & Haney, 2006; Poels et al., 2013). However, this knowledge transfer is challenging. For instance, work context descriptions are partly tacit and ambiguous (Alvarez & Urla, 2002; Ferrari et al., 2016); therefore, they are not easily transferred into concrete development efforts. In addition, users have difficulties processing information from their surroundings and communicating it to developers (Appan & Browne, 2010; Thew & Sutcliffe, 2017). Thus, system developers cannot fully absorb what users convey. Quite often, the context is simplified or distorted, resulting in unsatisfactory results (Holmström & Sawyer, 2011; Oran et al., 2021; Poels et al., 2013; Saghafi & Wand, 2020; Urquhart, 2001). We argue that limited understanding of the role and influence of narratives are contributing factors in this situation.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 35: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 34: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 33: 5 Issues (2022): 4 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 1: 2 Issues (1990)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing