Impact of Technostress on Withdrawal Behavior and Workplace Flourishing: Do Contextual Variables Matter?

Impact of Technostress on Withdrawal Behavior and Workplace Flourishing: Do Contextual Variables Matter?

Mohamed Dawood Shamout, Malek Bakheet Haroun Elayan, Salima Hamouche, Adnan M. Rawashdeh, Hamzah Elrehail
Copyright: © 2022 |Pages: 17
DOI: 10.4018/IRMJ.312212
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic's ripple effects on the digital work sphere have been widely recognized and debated. But little is known about how much technostress influences workers' overall well-being (i.e., workplace flourishing) during the pandemic. This paper (drawing on social roles and self-efficacy theories) investigates the effect of technostress on flourishing at work and withdrawal behavior and the contextual roles of gender, generation, and work practices. Survey data were randomly obtained from workers in various educational sectors in Saudi Arabia (n = 538) and analyzed using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) and multi-group moderation analysis. Accordingly, technostress positively affects work withdrawal behavior and reduces workplace flourishing. Variations in these associations were observed based on generational cohorts and work flexibility or mode. But no significant gender variations occurred. This study provides managerial insights and strategies to deal with technostress's ripple effect due to restrictions and measures provoked by the pandemic.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

The COVID-19 pandemic forced most organizations to abruptly shift their activities (fully or partially) to the digital sphere. Employees’ inability to use the newly digitalized systems to work during the pandemic may cause stress (Turel et al., 2019). Technostress describes the inability to cope with using an information system tool (Brod, 1984). Barber and Santuzzi (2015) defined technostress as “stress creators appraised by the individual as threatening.” Technostress is not only a source of distraction and interruption (Sonnentag et al., 2018) but also a source of adverse health and well-being (Tarafdar et al., 2020). Positive work interactions foster positive attitudes and behaviors, such as constructive emotions, high morale, job satisfaction and engagement (Luthans and Broad, 2020; Lyubomirsky et al., 2005), and workplace flourishing (Redelinghuys et al., 2019a). Personal growth, quality work relationships, and other organizational interactions foster workplace flourishing (Colbert et al., 2016; Diedericks and Rothmann, 2014).

Employees thrive when performing job-related activities well and experiencing elevated well-being (Keyes, 2007). But the lack of flourishing can inspire a mild form of misbehavior, such as withdrawal. Work withdrawal behavior has increased organizations’ hiring costs since lateness and absenteeism decrease productivity, collective efforts, and work quality (Abubakar et al., 2017; Loi et al., 2015). Because these behaviors are branded non-economic, practitioners and scholars have long ignored their organizational financial table and analysis costs. According to the 2017 Global Workplace report, work withdrawal behaviors cost the US economy around $450 billion, $151 billion to the German economy, and $83 billion to the UK economy (Lifexchange, 2021). Because such behaviors could profoundly impact the Saudi economy, studying workplace flourishing and withdrawal behavior from a technological perspective (e.g., technostress) is essential.

In the wake of technostress, individuals respond to stressful events in various ways, with some displaying avoidance and coping behaviors. Individuals may decrease their use of digitalized systems or quit using them altogether when faced with technostress (Nimrod, 2018a; Salazar-Concha et al., 2021; Tarafdar et al., 2020). The current work considers and examines these realities within the contexts of workplace flourishing and employee withdrawal behavior. This study’s purpose is threefold. First, policy debates and discussions have advocated for remote working, linking it to several positive outcomes for workers and organizations. But the Covid-19 pandemic accelerated migration to remote working, which has altered and produced new, negative work habits (Nimrod, 2020; Pullins et al., 2020), popularly known as technostress. This study aims to generate scholarly research regarding this phenomenon.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 37: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 35: 4 Issues (2022): 3 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 34: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 33: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1989)
Volume 1: 1 Issue (1988)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing