Article Preview
TopIntroduction
In an ever-changing environment, companies must create new products, services and processes to compete and survive (Avlonitis et al., 2000).
The element of differentiation is not only the benefit that exceptional quality of products or services brings, but also excellent customer service (Kafchehi et al., 2016).
In this respect, satisfaction of customers is a very important key element for organizations. The expression “satisfied customer” in practice means high-exceptional quality, loyal customers and positive reputation due to increased customer satisfaction (Homburg and Rudolf, 2001). “Customer loyalty can only be earned and cannot be bought…” (Berry & Gresham, 2001). Experts estimate that most North American companies spend about 3% of revenues on customer satisfaction measurement. Customer Satisfaction (CS) surveys addresses the end product of the production line, revealing expectations and perceptions in total. In contrast, Customer Service Measurements (CSM) reveal performance at each identified stage of the production process. Clearly, both methods are important, but different (Buxton, 2000). According to Buxton (2000), both CS and CSM (Figure 1) affect each other.
Figure 1. The cycle of customer satisfaction and customer service measurement (adapted from Buxton, 2000)
Currently, Mystery Customer (MC) is used by many private and public organizations (Wilson, 1998). The use of MC is dated roughly from the 40s, when, naturally, it served different objectives and needs of organisations. Substantially it covers the need for control of integrity and efficiency of personnel (Yanli & Yao, 2015). However, in our times, because of the inexorable competition that prevails in the market, it has taken the form as a tool to measure the quality of customer service and customer satisfaction (Hesselink & Wiele, 2003). Broadly speaking, we could argue that it offers essential information to management about the level of quality its products and services provide as well as on the level of customer satisfaction. Furthermore, if we consider that the meaning of customer includes not only external but also internal ones, then we can understand how important the content of MC chain is, on monitoring and controlling the retail process. It is now a fact that MC survey results can be utilized to lead the marketing strategies (Hesselink & Wiele, 2003). It is a tool that supports the managers’ decision-making in order to maintain a high level of service.
In this respect, this study attempts to expand the method of application of MC in retail networks, by seeking to improve areas within the network (Singh et al. 2014). In particular, it attempts to resolve practical and concrete problems of the network concerning the status of the chain stores in order to increase the customer service level.
The research seeks to utilize recent information concerning the performance in the retail operations to reduce specific suggestions for the improvement of quality service. It targets the classification of chain shops according to the performance level of customer service (Korhan, 2015). In addition, this study determines both first priority and second priority factors that need improvement. The goals of the determination of factors satisfy the following:
- 1.
To reveal the necessity of combination of two different measurement tools
- 2.
To provide a more flexible and effective managerial tool and
- 3.
To present a visualized managerial technique that can monitor and direct strategic alternatives for a better service quality experience.