Examining Toxic Leadership Nexus With Employee Cyberloafing Behavior via Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion

Examining Toxic Leadership Nexus With Employee Cyberloafing Behavior via Mediating Role of Emotional Exhaustion

Tianyu Fan, Jawad Khan, Osama Khassawneh, Tamara Mohammad
Copyright: © 2023 |Pages: 23
DOI: 10.4018/JOEUC.320817
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

From the perspective of social exchange and the conservation of resources theories, the current study investigated the effect of toxic leadership on employee cyberloafing behaviour via the mediating role of emotional exhaustion and the moderating role of organisational commitment. SPSS models 1:moderation, 4: mediation, and 14: moderation mediation of PROCESS Hayes were used to evaluate the data from 357 employees of the Chinese corporate sector. The results show a positive relation between toxic leadership and cyberloafing, and emotional exhaustion mediates this relationship. Further, organisation commitment moderates the indirect, interactive effect of toxic leadership and emotional exhaustion on cyberloafing. The model was tested using 3-wave data; however, since the data were attained from a single source, the problem of common method bias cannot be ruled out. To avoid or lessen instances of cyberloafing behaviour and encourage good working attitudes, organisations must also take action and develop regulations governing internet use in the workplace.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

The internet, an essential aspect of industry operations (Tandon et al., 2021), can significantly impact the productivity and efficiency of both employees and organisations (Koay & Soh, 2018b). While the internet may facilitate employees’ work, they may also use it to unwind during working hours. This will, in turn, compromise their ability to do their jobs (Andel et al., 2019). While at work, employees often cyberloaf on social media platforms like Facebook, YouTube, and WhatsApp (Koay & Soh, 2018b). This negative habit impacts organisational productivity and professional responsibilities (Zhong et al., 2022).

The number of workers who regularly use social networking sites via e-gadgets and mobile phones has increased by approximately 84.1% (Koay & Soh, 2018a). Gökçearslan et al. (2018) found that workers spend two hours per day on social media and non-work activities. Tandon et al. (2021) noted that employers may have a difficult time stopping employees from engaging in cyberloafing habits. Workplace productivity suffers when workers are too absorbed in their personal lives, which is detrimental to the organisation (Pindek et al., 2018).

There are many reasons employees practice cyberloafing behaviour in the workplace. As Reed (2004) noted, “toxic leadership is a type of leadership that is destructive to members of a team and the overall workplace” (p. 66). The leader’s toxic behaviour can influence employees’ attitudes and actions. The employees mindset may change from a constructive to destructive approach when leaders display intimidating behaviour toward subordinates (Bani-Melhem et al., 2020). Employees’ destructive approaches include turnover intention, anxiety, cyberloafing, and deviant or counterproductive work behaviours. Toxic leaders tend to be overconfident and arrogant. They view themselves as infallible. They scorn subordinates who dare to reprimand or disagree with their direction (Labrague, 2021).

Research has shown that the negative effect of toxic leadership on employee outcomes is at least as significant as the positive impact of constructive leadership practices (Mehta & Maheshwari, 2013). Misuse of power in the workplace has been linked to a range of negative effects on employee stress, absenteeism, job satisfaction, productivity, and loyalty (Zaman et al., 2022). Still, there is much to study regarding an individual’s feelings or behaviours related to their experience with toxic leadership.

Long-term, regular contact with toxic leaders increases stress and lowers employee well-being (Bani-Melhem et al., 2020). Employees who face toxic leadership feel abused and frustrated. Those who have worked with toxic leaders for an extended period tend to have poor self-worth and self-efficacy (Paton, 2021). Toxic leaders who shout, criticise, or ridicule subordinates will also increase emotional exhaustion, leading to behaviours that relieve stress. According to Gaines and Jermier (1983), “emotional exhaustion is a state of feeling emotionally worn-out and drained as a result of accumulated stress from your personal or work life, or a combination of both” (p. 568).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 36: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 35: 3 Issues (2023)
Volume 34: 10 Issues (2022)
Volume 33: 6 Issues (2021)
Volume 32: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 31: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 30: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 29: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 28: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 27: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 26: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 25: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 24: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2004)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2003)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2002)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2001)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2000)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (1999)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (1998)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (1997)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (1996)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (1995)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (1994)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (1993)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (1992)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (1991)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (1990)
Volume 1: 3 Issues (1989)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing