Enhancing Patient Care and Care Coordination using Event Notification Systems

Enhancing Patient Care and Care Coordination using Event Notification Systems

Steven H. Ton, Alice M. Noblin, Kendall Cortelyou-Ward, Victor A. Nunez
Copyright: © 2016 |Pages: 11
DOI: 10.4018/JCIT.2016010102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Event notification systems (ENS) are being deployed to provide timely alerts to participating providers when their patients are being admitted, discharged or transferred (ADT) from participating hospitals. Hospitals and health information exchanges (HIE) are implementing ENS in an effort to reduce costly hospital readmissions and to improve the overall quality of patient care through improved care coordination. Today, there are numerous ENS actively facilitating care coordination across the country. For those participating providers and hospitals, coordination has been significantly improved and hospital readmissions have been reduced. Furthermore, patients and clinicians report improved patient care and care coordination, and report higher levels of patient satisfaction. Despite reported success, the application and implementation of ENS vary across the country. Some of the variability stems from the challenges that are inherent to the design of the ENS. These challenges, discussed herein, require careful consideration in order to fully realize ENS benefits.
Article Preview
Top

Executive Summary

Event notification systems (ENS) are being deployed to provide timely alerts to participating providers when their patients are being admitted, discharged or transferred (ADT) from participating hospitals. Hospitals and health information exchanges (HIE) are implementing ENS in an effort to reduce costly hospital readmissions and to improve the overall quality of patient care through improved care coordination. Similarly, accountable care organizations (ACO) and health systems are also utilizing private information exchange networks to deploy ENS in pursuit of the same benefits.

Today, there are numerous ENS actively facilitating care coordination across the country. For those participating providers and hospitals, coordination has been significantly improved and hospital readmissions have been reduced. Furthermore, patients and clinicians report improved patient care and care coordination, and report higher levels of patient satisfaction. Despite these pockets of success, the application and implementation of ENS varies widely across the country. Some of the variability stems from the challenges that are inherent to the design of the ENS. These challenges require careful consideration in order to fully realize ENS benefits. Some of these challenges include:

  • 1.

    Minimizing the time required to deliver notifications to participating providers

  • 2.

    Optimizing the patient matching algorithms to ensure accurate patient identification

  • 3.

    Utilizing the right delivery methodology to trigger timely response from providers

  • 4.

    Balancing the cost - benefit inequity that drives non-ideal system designs

  • 5.

    Ensuring all patient populations are included and can benefit from the ENS service

Top

Organization Background

Reducing unnecessary healthcare utilization and the resulting costs remain a top national priority. CMS studies indicate that the national healthcare expenditure will exceed 2.5 trillion dollars by 2023, representing 19.3% of GDP, up from 17.2 percent in 2012 (CMS, 2013). Since the passage of the Affordable Care Act in 2010, cost containment efforts emphasize improving the coordination of care with the specific goal of reducing hospital readmission rates and improving the overall quality across the continuum of care. Consequently, hospitals and physicians are challenged with keeping patients from being readmitted or face significant financial penalties (Rau, 2014).

Today’s fragmented healthcare delivery system produces numerous challenges that obstruct the pursuit of delivering high quality, cost-effective healthcare (Shortell, Gillies, Anderson, Erickson, & Mitchen, 1996). Today it is possible for patients to be treated by different care providers within the same geographic region and for these providers to be completely unaware of the care provided outside of their practice. This regrettable lack of coordination is not limited to smaller facilities such as private practices and small clinics. Care coordination between hospitals and between hospitals and private practices is also lacking. For example, it is not uncommon for primary care providers to be unaware of a patient’s hospitalization until the patient reports the event afterwards (Arora, et al., 2010). This report may take place in a week, months or years after discharge. One study revealed that one-third of primary care providers never learn about their patient’s hospitalization (Kazzaz, 2014).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 26: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 25: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 24: 5 Issues (2022)
Volume 23: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 22: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 21: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 20: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 19: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2005)
Volume 6: 1 Issue (2004)
Volume 5: 1 Issue (2003)
Volume 4: 1 Issue (2002)
Volume 3: 1 Issue (2001)
Volume 2: 1 Issue (2000)
Volume 1: 1 Issue (1999)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing