Article Preview
TopIntroduction
The simplicity, speed and accessibility of Web-based searches have radically changed the way individuals search for information. While individuals once sought restaurant menus, movie times and train schedules in newspapers, phone books or other print media, most now prefer to search for this type of information online. Moreover, many also depend on Web-based searches to evaluate companies, products, services, service providers and even potential employees prior to making a selection decision. The returned list of search results enables searchers to form first impressions of objects or individuals based solely on the information gathered on the Web.
While it may be tempting to characterize the Web as essentially equivalent to traditional print media as a basis for forming impressions, a critical look reveals fundamental differences. Relative to traditional media, Web-based sources are easier to access and search, much more amenable to aggregation and have a longer lifespan. Further, these sources are growing exponentially with Web 2.0 technologies which provide unprecedented opportunities for anyone to create and post their own content (Kalyanaraman & Sundar, 2008). Although Web-based information lacks the well-established integrity controls of traditional print media, it has become an important source of information for decision making in both personal and professional contexts. A recent study sponsored by Microsoft surveyed 275 US hiring managers and human resource professionals about their hiring practices and found that 85% of these recruiters work for firms that have hiring policies requiring them to investigate potential candidates online and 70% admitted to turning down potential employees based on the information they found on the Web (Cross-tab, 2010). Given the importance of decisions being made based on impressions created solely from Web searches, it is imperative that we understand the characteristics of both the searcher and the searched that may impact formation of these impressions. Indeed, McKenna and Bargh (2000) argue that,
…like the telephone and television before it, the Internet by itself is not a main effect cause of anything, and that psychology must move beyond this notion to an informed analysis of how social identity, social interaction, and relationship formation may be different on the Internet than in real life. (p. 57)
It is in this spirit that we seek to better understand Web-based impression formation in this study.
For a business, the portion of its identity that is Web-searchable is often referred to as its Web presence. Individuals also have a presence on the Web that reflects the digitally hosted and searchable portion of their identity. Venkatsubramanyan and Hill (2009a) refer to this online portion of an individual’s identity as ePersona. One’s ePersona is derived from a variety of sources – personal home pages, social and professional networking sites, organizational Web pages, news articles, blogs and others. Passive viewers of this information (i.e. “perceivers”) then develop impressions depending primarily, if not exclusively, on the ePersona (Vazire & Gosling, 2004; Venkatsubramanyan and Hill, 2009a; 2009b). In the research presented here, we build upon Venkatsubramanyan and Hill’s (2009a) model of impression formation, using Web search results as surrogates for ePersonas, to explore how the quantity of these search results influences ePerception. Additionally we examine how these effects differ by the gender of the searched individual, the “target,” as compared with that of the perceiver. The results are both interesting and valuable in light of the common practice of “Googling” potential employees by organizations and given the integral role gender issues play in the social power and political dynamic of the workplace.