A framework of pertinence to and which guides the present empirical study is the social semiotic theory of multimodality (Kress, 2010). It posits that language is not exclusively the primary resource through which communication can occur, as other available socially based semiotic resources can be tapped into for meaning-making. Miller (2013), accordingly, argued that complex resources for meaning representation are represented by multimodal composition (MMC). According to Smith (2017), “multimodal composition involves the fluid interweaving of visuals, sounds, movement, and text to create synergistic messages” (p. 259). Therefore, DMC tasks in this study are grounded on the multimodality-based perspective of intersemiotic complementarity that refers to producing meaningful MMC through the integration of a variety of semiotic resources that complement and relate to each other (Royce, 2002).