Article Preview
TopIntroduction
Currently, digital business models are enjoying enormous success, which can be attributed to the driving force of electronic information and the value it generates (Amit & Zott, 2001; Kollmann & Hensellek, 2016, 2017). The three most valuable companies in the world (Microsoft, Apple, and Alphabet) are not only equipped with a market capitalization exceeding that of all companies in the German DAX30 index but also they are operating in the digital economy and are particularly proficient in dealing with digital information and the associated “information triple jump,” which comprises the three steps of information gathering, processing, and transfer (Kollmann, 2019; Kollmann & Hensellek, 2016, 2017). In addition to their highly digitally oriented business model, these companies also have in common that they were led to success by outstanding personalities. This raises a question regarding which skills and ways of thinking and acting are necessary in the digital age to lead a digital company to success or to successfully lead a company from the classical economy through the process of digital transformation. In this vein, the classic requirements for good leadership are not obsolete, but must be supplemented and transformed.
The pressure to innovate is reflected in two particularly relevant theoretical approaches in leadership research (Leitch, McMullan, & Harrison, 2013). First, the focus has shifted away from the interest in classic personality traits of a lonely leader at the top toward leadership as a role in itself that is not defined by individuals’ traits but by their interactions in a social and organizational context (Day, 2000; Thorpe, Cope, Ram, & Pedler, 2009). Second, leadership, similar to digital transformation, is increasingly understood as a process that involves all members of an organization and is intended to develop leadership competence throughout the entire organization rather than just individual executives, which also points at the importance of good leadership at lower levels of an organization (Day, 2000; Leitch et al., 2013). Together, these two developments highlight the importance of the social and organizational context as an influencing factor for successful leadership (Fiedler & Chemers, 1974; Leitch et al., 2013).
Today, this context is strongly shaped by digitalization (Bharadwaj, El Sawy, Pavlou, & Venkatraman, 2013). On the one hand, this leads to a more complex and rapidly changing environment through which leaders need to navigate their organizations and to which they need to adapt their leadership (Fitzgerald, Kruschwitz, Bonnet, & Welch, 2014). On the other hand, it also offers new ways of work and leadership. For instance, the use of digital technologies in combination with modern leadership styles such as entrepreneurial leadership allow employees on lower levels to enjoy greater freedom and even a certain degree of self-leadership as long as they contribute to the organizational goals (Renko, El Tarabishy, Carsrud, & Brännback, 2015). For leaders, digital technologies mean new forms of communicating and organizing (El Sawy, Kræmmergaard, Amsinck, & Vinther, 2016). Against this backdrop, the present paper argues that digitalization is the driving force for the future success of organizations but classic leadership styles do not sufficiently address the opportunities and challenges arising from digitalization. In more details, I argue that digital leaders need to create an overarching digital vision of the future and possess the necessary skills and mindset to enable a people-centric implementation of this vision.