Designing a 6G System That Users Want

Designing a 6G System That Users Want

William Webb
DOI: 10.4018/IJITN.309702
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This paper argues that the process adopted to design 5G was not fully successful, with few of the design goals being met, and with more limited deployment and lower consumer enthusiasm than previous generations. This was because of undue influence from manufacturers and politicians and insufficient input from mobile operators and users. Hence, it is appropriate to question whether a different approach should be adopted to deliver 6G. The question is timely; within a year or two the approach towards 6G and its key targets will become increasingly hard to change.
Article Preview
Top

2G To 4G

The standards process worked reasonably well from 2G to 4G, evolving over time.

For 2G, the need was clear. First generation phones were much more successful than expected resulting in problems of capacity. There were myriad security issues and the lack of roaming and harmonisation was clearly problematic. 2G was designed to fix these problems and did so extremely well. It delivered excellent profitability for manufacturers and operators and unexpectedly new services such as SMS, which was added to the standard as a way for telecoms engineers to communicate with each other. It was driven heavily by mobile operators who often had large R&D departments and could play an active role.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2022)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2009)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing