CustNER: A Rule-Based Named-Entity Recognizer With Improved Recall

CustNER: A Rule-Based Named-Entity Recognizer With Improved Recall

Raabia Mumtaz, Muhammad Abdul Qadir
Copyright: © 2020 |Pages: 18
DOI: 10.4018/IJSWIS.2020070107
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

This article describes CustNER: a system for named-entity recognition (NER) of person, location, and organization. Realizing the incorrect annotations of existing NER, four categories of false negatives have been identified. The NEs not annotated contain nationalities, have corresponding resource in DBpedia, are acronyms of other NEs. A rule-based system, CustNER, has been proposed that utilizes existing NERs and DBpedia knowledge base. CustNER has been trained on the open knowledge extraction (OKE) challenge 2017 dataset and evaluated on OKE and CoNLL03 (Conference on Natural Language Learning) datasets. The OKE dataset has also been annotated with the three types. Evaluation results show that CustNER outperforms existing NERs with F score 12.4% better than Stanford NER and 3.1% better than Illinois NER. On another standard evaluation dataset for which the system is not trained, the CoNLL03 dataset, CustNER gives results comparable to existing systems with F score 3.9% better than Stanford NER, though Illinois NER F score is 1.3% better than CustNER.
Article Preview
Top

1. Introduction

Most of the data available on the web is not semantically structured. This results into not-precise and high-recall answers of queries by web search engines. Tools and techniques need to be developed for extraction and semantically structuring the web data, which would then enable answering meaningful and precise queries. One of the very important semantics that need to be extracted from the data is named entities (NEs). The term “named entity” means names of persons, organizations and geographical locations (Grishman & Sundheim, 1996). Named entity recognition (NER) is the process of identifying named instances of pre-defined classes in running text (Goyal, Gupta, & Kumar, 2018).

Development of NER systems has been encouraged to address the challenges in the domain, by several editions of evaluation events such as the message understanding conference, MUC (Chinchor, 1998; Sundheim & Grishman, 1996), the conference on natural language learning, CoNLL 2003 (Tjong, Sang, & Meulder, 2003), the automatic content extraction program, ACE (Nist et al., 2004) and the open knowledge extraction challenge, OKE (Rene Speck, Roder, Oramas, Espinosa-Anke, & Ngomo, 2017). The subsequent editions of these conferences, MUC, CoNLL, ACE and OKE have contributed significantly in the domain of entity detection and recognition.

NER is considered an important component of information retrieval and knowledge extraction applications, for instance, in automatic narrative extraction with multiple accounts nested in news articles (Zhang, Boons, & Batista-Navarro, 2019), text summarization (Nagalavi & Hanumanthappa, 2019), question answering systems (Pizzato, Moll, & Paris, 2006), document theme extraction (Nagrale, Khatavkar, & Kulkarni, 2019), prediction and recommendation tasks in academic citation networks (Ganguly, 2019), document indexing (Humphreys, Calcagno, & Powell, 2006), and text mining in Genetics and Biomedical Sciences (Ananiadou, Kell, & Tsujii, 2006; Settles, 2004), to name a few.

Consider the following sample text:

Salma lives in Rawalpindi and is studying Computer Science at Capital University of Science & Technology. She is a part time worker at a call center in Islamabad.

If the pre-defined classes are person, location and organization, then the output of NER task on this text is the annotated text as given below:

[person] Salma [\person] lives in [location] Rawalpindi [\location] and is studying Computer Science at [organization] Capital University of Science & Technology [\organization]. She is a part time worker at a call center in [location] Islamabad [\location].

Typically, NER demands optimally combining a variety of clues including, orthographic features, parts of speech, similarity with existing database of entities, presence of specific signature words and so on. This makes NER a non-trivial modelling challenge, not solved yet with an acceptable high precision and recall, despite over three decades of research in the field (Sarawagi, 2008). Sarawagi observes that for many existing NER systems precision is high (the entities predicted are correct), but the bigger challenge is achieving high recall (correctly predicting all the entities available in a document), because without extensive labeled data it is not possible to detect what was missed in the large mass of unstructured information.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 20: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 19: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 18: 4 Issues (2022): 2 Released, 2 Forthcoming
Volume 17: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 16: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 15: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2008)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2007)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2006)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2005)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing