Comparison of Garbage Classification Frameworks Using Transfer Learning and CNN

Comparison of Garbage Classification Frameworks Using Transfer Learning and CNN

Mahendra Kumar Gourisaria, Rakshit Agrawal, Vinayak Singh, Manoj Sahni, Linesh Raja
DOI: 10.4018/IJSESD.313973
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

With the never-ending increase in the population, garbage and other waste materials have become one of the major hurdles in forming a healthy environment. The proliferation in the development of such schemes and integration of technology brings up the concept of smart waste management based on its biodegradability. These proposed models can be found useful to the smart waste development program and other likely schemes which require the classification of garbage based on their images. The experiment uncovers the reasons behind the working of VGG19 and A9 architecture CNN-based models which were found to provide the best results in accurately detecting the type of garbage. Experimental evaluation was based on 27 models including out of which A9 and VGG19 models were found to be the most efficient ones with 92.24% and 86.35% accuracy, respectively, which are further compared in detail for understanding these models better.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

Before the development in the field of deep learning models, a big chunk of features was delineated manually (LeCun et al., 1989) and then provided to the models. Many Deep CNN models have been introduced for the image classification process (Vo et al., 2018; Vo et al., 2019; Hu et al., 2019) like RR-VGG, HF-SD (Hybrid Framework for Smile Detection), CS-LSMP, etc. Apart from these CNN models based on image processing, machine learning has built a stand-in early diagnosis and classification processes in various industries (Sahu et al., 2020), medical (Gourisaria et al., 2021), agricultural, etc. models. Yang et al. (Yang and Thung, 2016) provided a Trashnet dataset that comprises six different classes namely glass, paper & cardboard, plastic, metal, and trash. All the data samples were of image type which was captured using a variety of devices.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 15: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 14: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 13: 9 Issues (2022)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2010)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing