Causes of China's Low Consumption from the Perspective of Local Governmental Competition

Causes of China's Low Consumption from the Perspective of Local Governmental Competition

Yaling Zhu, Huifang Zhang
DOI: 10.4018/IJISSCM.2020010102
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

Taking into account the three-sector general equilibrium perspective of the government, business, and household sectors and taking government public goods investment as intermediary; this article builds mathematical models of local governmental competition and three-sector consumption. It also theoretically analyzes the impacting path of local governmental competition, causing increased investment in public goods, thereby reducing consumption. At the same time, based on the model of China's provincial panel data from 1993 to 2015, the empirical analysis shows that a 1% increase in the level of competition among local governments will result in a corresponding decrease of 0.757% in total consumption, 0.348% in governmental competition, 0.340% in business consumption and 0.366% in household consumption. Local governmental competition leads to the government's tendency to invest in public goods and reduces the regional consumption, which especially damages the consumption capacity of the household sector.
Article Preview
Top

Literature Review

As for the reason why the consumption rate in China is so low, scholars have conducted various research studies and have obtained valuable findings.

Summarizing the existing literature, the authors find that scholars have mostly studied the causes of low consumption from the following three aspects of the issue: Firstly, the macroeconomic variables that affect consumption – variables including the price index (Chen, 2009; Zhang, 2009; Liu, 2014; Liao, 2014, etc.), income disparity (Meyer & Sullivan, 2013; Lise, 2014; Zhang, 2016), interest rate, and financial development (Wang & Jiang, 2006; Wu, 2015; etc.); Secondly, the micro-economic variables related to income (Chakrabarty et al., 2006; Zhu, 2012; Chen, 2012; Zheng et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2016) and family situation (Tan et al., 2014; Li & Chen, 2014; Song, 2016); Thirdly, various consumer-related policies, mainly social security policies, fiscal and taxation policies, credit policy, and so on (Jia, 2012; Guo et al., 2013; John, 2014; Long et al., 2016).

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 17: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2023)
Volume 15: 7 Issues (2022): 6 Released, 1 Forthcoming
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2008)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing