An Alternative Approach to Parliamentary Oversight of Sovereign Guarantees in South Africa: ESKOM as a Polar Case Study

An Alternative Approach to Parliamentary Oversight of Sovereign Guarantees in South Africa: ESKOM as a Polar Case Study

Anthony Frank Julies
Copyright: © 2024 |Pages: 27
DOI: 10.4018/IJSEM.349968
Article PDF Download
Open access articles are freely available for download

Abstract

The research paper constructs and compares two structural risk models. A South African sovereign risk model and an ESKOM credit risk model. The interaction between these models explains the statistically significant causal relationship between corporate governance practices at the level of a public entity and government finance conditions between 2004 and 2019. It shows that a more effective approach to parliamentary oversight of government guarantees in South Africa can deliver better sovereign credit rating outcomes in post-COVID-19 South Africa. It will require proactive innovative measures in the application of government guarantees issued to SOEs aimed at improving institutional operational performance within a government-wide risk management framework. The paper concludes that economic transformation, with restitutive intent, is advanced with the adoption of a dynamic and evidenced-informed approach in addressing the complex interplay of prevailing socio-economic, government finance, and political environmental conditions in South Africa.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

Sovereign guarantees extended by governments to state-owned enterprises (SOEs) have a potential innovative and catalytic impact on public finances. The quality of parliamentary oversight decides, meaningfully, the extent to which such instruments of public finance management (PFM) contribute to a country’s socio-economic transformation agenda and favourable sovereign credit rating outcomes.

This paper responds to the following empirical questions: Why are corporate governance institutions ineffective in preventing persistent poor SOE financial performance? Why do governments fail to exert pressure on SOEs to improve their finances? How do historical political contexts affect economic policies that, in turn, impact SOE financial outcomes?

Figure 1 shows the sovereign guarantee exposure in South Africa from 2005 to 2019.

Figure 1.

South Africa sovereign guarantee exposure between 2005 and 2019

IJSEM.349968.f01
Note. Source: 2020 National Treasury Budget statistics.

Eskom is a monopoly SOE operating in the South African energy sector and is fully state-owned. Table 1 shows the extent of fiscal support provided to Eskom between 2004 and 2019, and Figure 2 shows the rise in government guarantees issued to Eskom following the global financial crisis (GFC) in 2008.

Table 1.
Significant cumulative fiscal support to Eskom (2004 to 2019)
Fiscal YearFiscal Transfers to Eskom (R’ billions)Cumulative Fiscal Transfers to Eskom (R’ billions)Cumulative Guarantees (Exposure)1 to Eskom (R’ billions)Cumulative Fiscal Transfers and Guarantees (exposure) to Eskom (R’ billions)GDP2 (R’ billions)Cumulative Budget Support to Eskom as a Percent of GDP
2004/05
0
0
0
0
0
0
2005/06
0
0
0
0
0
0
2006/07
0
0
0
0
0
0
2007/08
0
0
0
0
0
0
2008/09
10
10
0
10
2408.7
0.42
2009/10
30
40
46.68
86.68
2551.4
3.4
2010/11
20
60
67.1
127.1
2825.0
4.5
2011/12
0
60
77.2
137.2
3078.4
4.46
2012/13
0.7
60.7
103.5
164.2
3320.8
4.95
2013/14
0
60.7
125.1
185.8
3614.5
5.14
2014/15
0
60.7
150
210.7
3865.1
5.45
2015/16
23
83.7
174.6
258.3
4124.7
6.26
2016/17
0
83.7
202.8
286.5
4419.4
6.48
2017/18
0
83.7
250.7
334.4
4698.7
7.12
2018/19
0
83.7
285.6
369.3
4921.5
7.50
2019/2049132.7297.45430.15157.48.34

Note. Source: National Treasury Budget Reviews.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 13: 1 Issue (2025): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 12: 1 Issue (2024)
Volume 11: 1 Issue (2022)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2012)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing