Article Preview
Top1. Introduction
With the development of human society, the development of interior design is also step by step and serves people’s life (Grieze & Miķelsone 2021, Hasti & Kusnia 2019). People's life and interior design promote each other with the development of society (Chen & Wang 2020, Afifi 2020). The great difference between design and art is that design pays more attention to practical functions. Different design products have different use functions, and the requirements of different interior design are also different. Because the applicable population and spatial positioning of indoor space are different, the design methods will also be different.
The interior design evaluation refers to the comparison and evaluation of the interior design (Wang & Hsiao 2018, Valiyev 2020). It should be noted that interior design evaluation belongs to a neutral attitude, which is only a scientific evaluation of interior design works. The interior design is the product of people's practical life (Tautkute 2019). In the process of interior design development, there will be cases that do not conform to the people-oriented concept, and the designed products are incompatible with the market, which is also the reason for the emergence of interior design evaluation. In order to maintain the competitiveness of the product itself, the designer must push through the old and bring forth the new. This process also needs design evaluation. In interior design, the designer himself is a design evaluator. He has been in a state of repeated modification for his own design, in which the designer plays an important role in the design process.
The interior design is a relatively large design scope, which contains many elements, such as building decoration materials (Cao 2021, Zeng & Jiang 2018), indoor furniture (Viyanon 2017, Sarkar & Bardhan 2019), and decoration style (Tong 2019, Jinkun 2017). The evaluation methods are also different in these different interior design elements. The interior design evaluation is used to compare and comment on design works. For a design work, the evaluation is related to its factors and consumer requirements. For the decoration materials required for interior designer, people pay more attention to its environmental protection on the premise of paying attention to its aesthetics, which is also the difference between it and other design elements. For the evaluation of decoration materials, we should take green environmental protection as the premise and focus on its functionality since the existence value of decoration materials lies in its functionality to support and form the whole indoor space.
For the evaluation method of interior design, we should not only take care the functionality and aesthetics of the furniture itself, but also put the furniture in the corresponding indoor space and watch its overall effect. Furniture has its own design style. The corresponding location in indoor space depends not only on its own style, but also on whether the design style of furniture in the whole interior design is appropriate, which is also the particularity of furniture design evaluation.
For everyone's favorite design elements, the favorite style and suitable style are different. For instance, children need bright and lively colors to suit their childlike innocence. The elder’s house needs to be designed with ease, comfort and generosity, which is not suitable for a large number of complex decorations. Each design style needs special evaluation method. For the interior design evaluation, we should first start from people, adopt the people-oriented concept, and carry out scientific evaluation and theoretical analysis. However, as the object of human being is the evaluator, it is inevitable that subjective factors will appear in the interior design evaluation process, which requires our evaluators to make an objective and fair evaluation and give a rational answer to the public and society. In this paper, we adopts image aesthetics to evaluate interior design.