Academic Virtual Meetings Management with a Synthesis Builder

Academic Virtual Meetings Management with a Synthesis Builder

Farida Bouarab-Dahmani
Copyright: © 2017 |Pages: 20
DOI: 10.4018/JITR.2017040103
OnDemand:
(Individual Articles)
Available
$37.50
No Current Special Offers
TOTAL SAVINGS: $37.50

Abstract

In this paper, we propose asynchronous virtual meeting (AVM) as a tool that can be integrated to virtual campuses, university Web sites or e-learning platforms. It is a way for participants from academics and students to discuss for a defined period, one or more topics. The AVM participants have to give, respectively, objective and punctual interventions as opinions, responses chosen from a proposed list and/or suggestions. In real time, specific processes for data analysis give a progressive synthesis of the discussions visible for all participants. The proposed tool can avoid different problems and constraints that the higher education meetings organizers are faced to. We developed a prototype for the tool that was tested with a group of participants from our university. The results were interesting and showed contribution to enhance communication and decision making in higher education.
Article Preview
Top

Introduction

After the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) challenges, different academic tasks use technologies to enhance management and teaching/learning processes in higher education. Technology in general has not only improved knowledge storing methods and learning techniques but has also acted as a catalyst to struggle the barriers of inflexible organizational structures (Shabha, 2000). Hence, some universities move to virtual workspaces or e-university where networks, Internet, computer science processes ... are used to do or help the departments (the smallest components in a university) activities. We are analyzing nowadays the use of ICTs for concrete add-ons to education institution, so we have to analyze problematic situations and try to solve them using the existing and rich technology tools. A survey done by Watson Wyatt company showed that firms that communicate effectively are four times more likely to report high levels of employee engagement compared with firms that communicate less effectively (Watson-Wyatt, 2007). Garrison and Anderson assert that “to realize that potential of e-Learning as an open but cohesive system to support learning, it is essential that we rethink our pedagogy” (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2000).

This means improve of the general management of trainings. One among these problematic situations that affect higher education management, pedagogy and perhaps also trainings quality is related to academic meetings. Indeed, different meetings are scheduled in a department or higher levels of university hierarchy to discuss different pedagogical, administrative, scientific or social questions. Always, the concerned with the meeting are required to make efforts to free themselves for the appointment and sometimes, they are forced to give up some tasks such as teaching. In addition, some issues discussed during the meeting require serious reflection and maybe even data to provide a successful review or proposition. However, when these issues are presented during the meeting, a participant can just give shallow opinions and/or suggestions. Sometimes, for important subjects, these can lead to other appointments to continue the discussion and the same constraints are repeated for the group involved in the meeting. The third problem is related to the number of persons to invite to the meeting: the question can involve all students and all teachers (about Five hundred people (500) for a department) for example, however, it is impossible to have everyone on the place of the meeting. The organizers will then be faced with the sensitive issue of persons’ choice. The chosen ones will propose opinions/suggestions in place of the others which can lead to conflicting situations that disrupts the department or all the university activities and give out inadequate decisions. This is from one hand, from another hand, the authors in (Romano & Nunamaker, 2001) show an analysis about the meetings costs that can be considerable if hold with the face to face mode. To avoid these problems, some meetings designers thought about the use of technology. Hence, a variety of augmented meeting support (AMS) technologies (Meyer& Bulyk, 1986-a) (Meyer & Bulyk, 1986-b) exist that may improve productivity including 3-Dimensional multiimaging (Lester, 1987), Video teleconferencing (Rosetti, 1985) television/film, both technology and actual content (Restuccio, 1985) and automated group support systems (Nunamaker, Dennis, Valacich, Vogel, & George, 1993) (Nunamaker & Briggs, 1996). Consequently, the majority of the existing works on virtual meetings concern the synchronous virtual meetings such as videoconferencing. “A videoconference is a set of interactive telecommunication technologies which allow two sites or more to interact through bidirectional video and audio transmissions simultaneously” (GIVP, 2008). However, synchronous meetings can have the same constraints than the face to face ones added to those related to the used technology (quality of the used networks, the state of the used computer at the meeting time, etc). For that, we studied the case of meetings inspired by contextualized forums that can improve the quality of the meetings results and decrease the participation constraints for the academics. In this paper, we propose asynchronous virtual meetings as an integrated module in the e-department (the digital workspace for a university department) space or even to digital campuses or e-learning platforms.

Complete Article List

Search this Journal:
Reset
Volume 16: 1 Issue (2024): Forthcoming, Available for Pre-Order
Volume 15: 6 Issues (2022): 1 Released, 5 Forthcoming
Volume 14: 4 Issues (2021)
Volume 13: 4 Issues (2020)
Volume 12: 4 Issues (2019)
Volume 11: 4 Issues (2018)
Volume 10: 4 Issues (2017)
Volume 9: 4 Issues (2016)
Volume 8: 4 Issues (2015)
Volume 7: 4 Issues (2014)
Volume 6: 4 Issues (2013)
Volume 5: 4 Issues (2012)
Volume 4: 4 Issues (2011)
Volume 3: 4 Issues (2010)
Volume 2: 4 Issues (2009)
Volume 1: 4 Issues (2008)
View Complete Journal Contents Listing